I've just recently noticed the ever-growing of robotic voice for commentary. What's the story? Is there a new software that permits that. Not that I'm interested, I think it sounds creepy.r2d2 said:Quite impressive desk (diy) handmade ,
much more impressive the baby "driver" (very good start point to…)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6zseFi070E
peace
Do you mean voice simulator (as inside OSX) or else more ?abbey road d enfer said:I've just recently noticed the ever-growing of robotic voice for commentary. What's the story? Is there a new software that permits that. Not that I'm interested, I think it sounds creepy.
I'm a PC guy, never heard of a voice simulator in a computer, or maybe Hal :-[r2d2 said:Do you mean voice simulator (as inside OSX) or else more ?
Of course I'm aware of talking devices. Renault was a pioneer in talking cars in the last century; people were so annoyed they asked to have it silenced.PRR said:> never heard of a voice simulator in a computer
We made Apple ][e computers "talk" mid-1980s (external DigiTalker box).
My Android talks to me when it thinks I have asked it a question. (No; if I have a question I will type it.)
My PC Adobe Acrobat Reader can "Read Out Loud". Sounds like Steven Hawking, but not as human.
Win7 Ease Of Access control panel has Narrator. Voice is female but choppier than fake-Hawking.
Both have a real lack of punctuation and line-break recognition. I do recall on the DigiTalker we spent hours marking-up the text to get natural breaks insteadofallruntogether. (Also a lot of mis-spelt words because English is such a nasty language.)
Obviously such techno-speech is potentially far cheaper than voice talent.
I can see the point as an aid for disabled people and as an element of talking devices, but I think using that as a substitute to a commentator is sinister. When I hear that, I just go away, even if the content is useful/attractive/pertinent. IMO, people doing that are shooting themselves in the foot, at least AFAIC.peterc said:There are a bunch of online text to audio converters.
All sound similarly awful.
There was something that was just as bad if not worse. These animated videos created from test dialogue using "xtranormal." Fortunately, that company has gone out of business. I dare not look on Youtube to see if there are any videos left that were made with it.abbey road d enfer said:I can see the point as an aid for disabled people and as an element of talking devices, but I think using that as a substitute to a commentator is sinister. When I hear that, I just go away, even if the content is useful/attractive/pertinent. IMO, people doing that are shooting themselves in the foot, at least AFAIC.
benb said:I saw the title and thought this was going to be a mixing desk, but nooooooo ...
Even creepier...midwayfair said:In case you were serious, it's not a robot voice, the dude's just not an expressive reader.
abbey road d enfer said:Even creepier...
midwayfair said:When I was six, the only toy I wanted for Christmas was a model of the space shuttle. Somewhat morbidly, we had a VHS tape with the Challenger launch on it,
Enter your email address to join: