rock soderstrom
Tour de France
Well, as I said, the original problem is solved so far.
Just for the sake of completeness, a few comments from my side, as unlike others I just had the amp in front of me.
The additional filtering does no harm and the resistor is not mounted directly on the PCB but approx. 2 cm above it. It is sufficiently dimensioned and therefore does not cause any heat damage to the PCB.
Basically, PSUs can be designed in different ways, the additional B+ filtering has nothing to do with the original (now solved!!) problem.
You seem to like telling your tech anecdotes, late at night with a glass of wine perhaps? You've come to the right place, so once again a warm welcome.
Just for the sake of completeness, a few comments from my side, as unlike others I just had the amp in front of me.
This resistor is not pointless and I strongly advise (for future readers) not to simply remove it. B+ (the heater voltage too) are at the upper limit in this amp.but a 4 watt 220R resistor on the B+ between the reservoir cap and Node A is both pointless and an unnecessary source of heat that could harm the PCB, especially if it's mounted directly on the board.
The additional filtering does no harm and the resistor is not mounted directly on the PCB but approx. 2 cm above it. It is sufficiently dimensioned and therefore does not cause any heat damage to the PCB.
Basically, PSUs can be designed in different ways, the additional B+ filtering has nothing to do with the original (now solved!!) problem.
There's not much left of the points you mentioned in your first post in a rather arrogant manner? Apology accepted.If I've ruffled some feathers, I apologize. That wasn't my intention.
You seem to like telling your tech anecdotes, late at night with a glass of wine perhaps? You've come to the right place, so once again a warm welcome.