lagoausente
Well-known member
So, in reallity, the chip takes 11,29 million of samples per second??This also why I'm quite sceptical about statements like
'using 96 Khz is better than 44.1 kHz because the filter is better, since there is more room to filter...'
because isn't 256x already more than enough?? It probably makes sence for non-oversampling converters, which are not the converters they are listening to.
I´m quite confused here. I have read on other forums, that for example a AD 192k chip, always workds at 192khz, but what occurs when switching to 44.1 is a downsampling.
But as you tell, really is working to some MHz always, not?