I completely respect your opinion and if your mic gives you 90% of the satisfaction of the vintage version, then it only makes sense for you to go with that. I really encourage that. But, I think it would be good to respect other's opinions without reverting to "facepalm". I generally disagree with the audiophile types but I know a lot of high-level engineers with great ears who hear significant differences in things that many skeptics overlook.Khron said:I, for one, hate spending money for no good reason
For example, if we're talking making / modding mics - if i can get 90% of a "vintage" mic, for (less than) 10% of the price, why the hell not? Yes, i'd rather use good (industrial) quality japanese radial electrolytics rather than hard-to-find, relatively expensive and doubtful longevity axial ones. Yes, i'd rather use "jellybean" resistors than some military-grade ones. Yes, i'd rather use some reasonably-sized "plastic" caps (rather than oversized & overpriced "audio" caps) or paper-in-oil caps as old as my dad. That's partially why i've amassed the collection of plastic caps i've "harvested" from various boards i've laid my hands on, along the years Aaaaand i'm a bit skeptical about the whole turret-vs-PCB debate. Yes, we want the high-impedance nodes as nicely isolate as we can, but everything else is utterly irrelevant, isn't it?
And i'll admit, i'm not all that manic about "historical accuracy". Hell, a whole lot of those revered vintage mics don't even sound alike, even though they're the same models (due to different aging and whatnot), so who can really say how a "real" one sounds like, anyway? And at the end of the day, isn't it (even) more important how it sounds on a particular source?
Oh, and i can't help but facepalm when i hear how highly-revered "hand-wired" guitar amps are. I mean, seriously???...
Enter your email address to join: