thermionic
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 1,671
Steve – as we say here in London, you are a diamond geezer :guinness:
I have a full service manual (found it through Google - some kind soul scanned all pages and hosted it).
That is the PSU I see in my schematic. I have replaced tants with tants on all main PCBs. I’ve increased the voltage ratings on some (I had them in the drawer), but have adhered to SCI’s values capacitance-wise. I measured all tants that I removed for safety, and found 2 were dead short.
As for the PSU, I have replaced the tants with electrolytics. The 10uF tant is now a 47uf electro. All 2.2uF tants are now 22uF electrolytics. Each electro is bypassed with a 10nF polyprop cap. Apart from the higher-voltage rail, all other DC rails appear very clean on the 'scope (unloaded).
One Tech I spoke to talked about the "30v rail"... I think I may have been stupid here - and he could be talking about the P-P value of the +/-15v rails? I measured +28 (unloaded) and +24 (loaded) from the white / orange rail (unregulated on the 'schem - appears to come straight from the rectifier with one cap... Is this kind of loss normal for a raw DC supply?)... Unloaded, my voltmeter classes it as DC, but my scope shows around 5mV of jagged corruption… I put this down to a quirk in the P5’s PSU – it has never had a good reputation.
For what the Vregs cost, and bearing in mind how it’s nearly impossible to get a probe in there to look at the PSU’s behaviour under load, I think I’m going to replace all VRegs as par-for-the-course.
I noticed that the mains transformer is very noisy mechanically, but put this down to 50Hz and general noise from old E/I units. Is it possible for a TX to get funky under load?
FWIW, I'd say I'm 90% that the PSU is quite normal for a Rev 2. If it is ok and the P5 is behaving this way, what are the possible culprits? I was told a blown SSM2020 in the VCO would prevent turn-on?? What really makes me nervy is the sight of potted 'cocoons’, amalgamated into the top faces of ICs, with wires and passives spewing from them… Whatever were SCI thinking with regards to future repair? A P5 wasn’t cheap was it? I wonder if the 'cocoons' are in the schematic…
Thanks again,
Justin (edited about 10 times!)
I have a full service manual (found it through Google - some kind soul scanned all pages and hosted it).
That is the PSU I see in my schematic. I have replaced tants with tants on all main PCBs. I’ve increased the voltage ratings on some (I had them in the drawer), but have adhered to SCI’s values capacitance-wise. I measured all tants that I removed for safety, and found 2 were dead short.
As for the PSU, I have replaced the tants with electrolytics. The 10uF tant is now a 47uf electro. All 2.2uF tants are now 22uF electrolytics. Each electro is bypassed with a 10nF polyprop cap. Apart from the higher-voltage rail, all other DC rails appear very clean on the 'scope (unloaded).
One Tech I spoke to talked about the "30v rail"... I think I may have been stupid here - and he could be talking about the P-P value of the +/-15v rails? I measured +28 (unloaded) and +24 (loaded) from the white / orange rail (unregulated on the 'schem - appears to come straight from the rectifier with one cap... Is this kind of loss normal for a raw DC supply?)... Unloaded, my voltmeter classes it as DC, but my scope shows around 5mV of jagged corruption… I put this down to a quirk in the P5’s PSU – it has never had a good reputation.
For what the Vregs cost, and bearing in mind how it’s nearly impossible to get a probe in there to look at the PSU’s behaviour under load, I think I’m going to replace all VRegs as par-for-the-course.
I noticed that the mains transformer is very noisy mechanically, but put this down to 50Hz and general noise from old E/I units. Is it possible for a TX to get funky under load?
FWIW, I'd say I'm 90% that the PSU is quite normal for a Rev 2. If it is ok and the P5 is behaving this way, what are the possible culprits? I was told a blown SSM2020 in the VCO would prevent turn-on?? What really makes me nervy is the sight of potted 'cocoons’, amalgamated into the top faces of ICs, with wires and passives spewing from them… Whatever were SCI thinking with regards to future repair? A P5 wasn’t cheap was it? I wonder if the 'cocoons' are in the schematic…
Thanks again,
Justin (edited about 10 times!)