David Kulka
Well-known member
damnyankee said:David,
Thank you for sharing your expertise. I love old dbx compression - there's nothing like it. The more I learn about these old VCAs/RMSs, the greater appreciate I have for the complexity of the design considering they are built from only a handful of common components. It's brilliant engineering, no question about it.
Yep, handful of components. If you put a dbx 303 card and a Dolby A card side by side, the contrast is remarkable -- the Dolby card uses about ten times as many components, provides less noise reduction, and in a way, is actually more error prone, because it has 4 separate compression bands and requires alignment.
Maybe the downfall of dbx NR was that it worked too well. It doubled dynamic range of tape recorders, but also doubled frequency response and other tape deck errors, which I think was its main weakness. (Dolby magnified recorder errors too but to a lesser degree, because it did less compression and expansion.) Maybe, if dbx had settled for 1.5 to 1 compression instead of 2:1, it would have found more acceptance in the pro audio world.