Good Day Mr. Frobozz.Here the test results in my home made test box with one of my microphones. It is a a test box good enough to compare the capsules.in Blue the KK47 china and in purple the graphene I made. Both have that lack of basses I could hear clearly, and the graphene is more linear in high frequency: my ear was right!
Stray Thought No. 3987 -- The frequency curve indicates diminished bass falls below 150 Hz. While I appreciate you may desire a full range result, I wonder whether you have produced a really good vocal or solo instrument recording microphone. In this regard, I recall the number of microphones with a switchable high pass circuit which reduces very low frequency rumble. Your capsule does this automatically. Its evenhanded management of upper low, mid, and high frequencies - especially the sharp high frequency roll-off above 10,000 Hz suggest it would be ideal for capturing vocals and mid-to-upper-range instruments such as string instruments, flutes, guitars, wind instruments, etc. It might be especially useful for computer speech recognition and communications audio which purposely/intentionally limit input to the frequency range of human speech. Not necessarily what you want, but perhaps a very useful, albeit more limited, use case? After all, some of the best inventions were produced as accidental or unintended results of trying to make something else. Um ... ahem ... any traction? James - K8JHR -
