k brown
Well-known member
Even though the CM-63 don't have the deeply recessed diaphragm of the CM-60, I just verified that the '63s also sound smoother in the top octave with their grilles removed, with less 5k dip and 10k bump.I neglected to mention in post #43 that the capsules of the Takstar CM-63, having the same internal construction as CM-60, can have the same omni mod. In their case, the diaphragm is not so deeply placed behind the (better-designed) grille, so the removal of it would not be as noticeable, and probably not worth the effort.
Personally, I think theses CM-63s are the best value in an SDC right now, especially if you have the means to optimize the FET biasing of your particular example(s).
https://www.amazon.com/TAKSTAR-Instrument-Microphone-Professional-Gold-Plated/dp/B0C58XZ9RS/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2QE1PXBAT7LP2&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.IU5maeX4iqE3Gb4ElGY1QQ.aZGLmiaNlub6FiDhmL5JPNYwJ9U6Q30tmc1x6vVQM80&dib_tag=se&keywords=takstar+cm-63&qid=1723769342&sprefix=takstar+cm,aps,207&sr=8-1
These now sound very, very close to my (culled by The Sound Room c 2005) Okatave MK-012 cards.
@kingkorg - did you ever measure the CM-63 capsule without it's grille?
Just flatten out the slightly rolled edges of the mesh disc, and it will drop securely back in; unlike the CM-60, nothing needs to be trimmed from the edge of the disc. Of course removing these grilles makes the capsules much more fragile, so handle with care! Might be worth fashioning new mesh from something heavier/stiffer.
Attachments
Last edited: