My friend Chris Shelton always used to talk about how Reader's Digest should have had a archaeological joke page called Humor in Cuneiform.
And the mention of clay reminds me of the late S.J. Perelman's quip that "before they made me, they broke the mold."
<fa dumph>
Just so this isn't totally off topic, I would assert that no matter what the bias is applied to the first transistor of the darlington, structurally the voltage noise generators always r.m.s. sum. So the complementary pair will always outperform unless the configuration has so little gain from the first device that the second's noise becomes important. In many cases within a circuit these noise differences may be insignificant.
Darlingtons are great for simplicity and high input Z though, and the power supply rejection is pretty good owing to the high collector(s) impedance.
Also, for RF work if you make the impedance in the B-E of the second transistor really low, the pair becomes a sort of single-ended f sub t doubler, with the signal now usually taken at the collectors.