I was drafted in 1970 so I paid especially close attention to the Viet Nam war. It was lost in the evening news when the public was shown horrible scenes every evening at dinner time. The public did not have the stomach for it.
So it would have been won if the public would have been kept in the dark?
Maybe you're right. But it's not democratic at all, is it? In fact, it is the essence of fascism.
International relations have always been at least a two way tug of war between good and evil, with each side thinking they are the good guys.
The USA have killed millions in the region. And all of that to please Israel and Saudi Arabia. But you're losing the Saudis. Even when there were clear signs they bankrolled 9/11 and proof they killed Kashoggi. Those who were instrumental in delivering Kashoggi to the Saudi embassy in Turkey now have companies in Israel, Cyprus and Russia. But that doesn't even worry the NSA in the slightest. Turkey was more upset and investigated a lot better than all the US agencies combined. Go figure.
IMO that is a mischaracterization of what is going on. Putin's goals seem pretty transparent and allowing him to succeed in Ukraine will not stop him, but encourage him to encroach on other nearby neighbors.
Probably, maybe. He stated he wanted to support the Russian speaking Ukrainians in the Crimea and Ukraine. But even the Russian speaking population has had to flee (except the fascists who joined the Russian military). Just like Netanyahu, Putin needs the fascists to stay in power. If he can't win the war, he'll be dead in a jiffy.
The Palestinian's rights are being denied by Hamas.
LOL.
Years ago, Palestine was run by the PLO. The PLO was secular. Hamas isn't. Jihad is harder to overcome, since it will unite fanatic Muslims. And not only Arab muslims. There's an awful lot of muslims in Asia, for instance. And they are closely following what's happening. Some are already on their way to Palestine to become martyrs...
And Hamas was democratically elected. Why? Because there wasn't any other fraction that could offer hope. All the other fractions were being sabotaged by Israel. I wonder why Hamas wasn't...
If you want to free Palestine get rid of Hamas. Over the years Hamas has redirected millions in international aid to construct underground tunnels and bunkers beneath hospital, schools, and even UN offices.
That's simply not true. There's plenty of money from the Saudis, Qatar and other rich Arab oil nations flowing to Mekka. And from Mekka it can go anywhere in the world, including the USA. Easy buying politicians if you have a nearly unlimited budget.
I know, because I audited several EU aid programs. Sure, some money got lost, but it didn't go to Hamas, or any other splinter group. It went to businesses in the UK, Gibraltar and Malta. I was a bit disappointed whit the results of the audit when it showed only 45% of the money reached the Bekaa farmers. I was later told that was a succes. Usually, it was far less...
Still it was way better than the US effort to stop poppy farmers in Afghanistan. They spent 5 billion, the result was the best harvest ever. Now, explain that to me. Of course, in the same year, Haliburton stole 20 million $ worth of fuel and sold it to unknown buyers in Pakistan. That was quickly covered up. It seemed nobody at the Pentagon wanted to lose face. And, hey, it was only 20 million. Compared to the poppy debacle, that was just a fly fart...
They use innocent Palestinians as human shields. Ask yourself why Gaza's neighbors deny shelter to Palestinian refugees?
Because that would please Israel immensely. They have a habit of bombarding refugee camps in Lebanon and elsewhere. Can you imagine Egypt being very wary about Palestinian refugees when the current govt of Egypt is secular and trying hard to stay away from Jihadi's. The Egyptian govt would effectively be between two fires. Israel on one side, the jihadis on the other side. The same goes for Syria and Iran. Syria is secular, Iran isn't. And who can we thank for Iran's conversion? Yeah, it's the USA. And Gaza would be empty, to be occupied by (zionist) settlers.
This is not some pro-Israel conspiracy to kill Palestinians, this is other countries in the region acting in their own self interest. They don't want to allow Hamas's bad ideology to destabilize their own governments.
Is there anything left to destabilise in Iraq, or Lebanon?
IMO Iran is the developing nuclear threat in the region. I am not as good at mind reading as you are, but Iran has declared that they would like to make Tel Aviv glow in the dark.
I'm not mind reading at all. I just observe and listen to many sources. Syria and Iran don't want Jihad either, but they are constantly being harassed by Israel and Jihadi groups. If they don't react, the Jihadi's will grow in power. If they do react, they're being harassed by Israel.
And where is the central leadership of the Jihadis? Right, it's in Mekka. Have you noticed Mekka is only in the news during Hadj. This gets royally ignored by the USA (and the UK).
This is another old tired anti-Jewish screed, some of the most enduring anti-Jewish stereotypes have to do with money
So it's OK to take Israel's bribes? It wouldn't be OK if it was Russian or Chinese money, would it?
It happens, you know. Ultra right here was bought by Russians (the party leader was a close friend of the Russian ambassador) and later by the Chinese...
Money clearly has no colour. Money isn't communist, even when it comes from the CCP...