I don't want to bash someone's product, but you might want to steer away from the Haufe trafo. Mine, along with others are literally falling apart. AMI is expensive, but that won't happen with their product. Dennis at AMI is fantastic and will help to his full ability. David at Cinemag was so helpful, he deserves a raise. These are the things I have learned throughout this project and over the years of DIY.duantro said:Ha! I'm glad. Are there any other comments on the different transformers? so far I've read AMI t8 sounds like the original (but $120!), Cinemag's have good low end, but are darker than original, and Haufe made a round of the originals, but are they still available? How do the 3U gtz 84's sound? any thoughts?
iturnknobs said:I don't want to bash someone's product, but you might want to steer away from the Haufe trafo. Mine, along with others are literally falling apart. AMI is expensive, but that won't happen with their product. Dennis at AMI is fantastic and will help to his full ability. David at Cinemag was so helpful, he deserves a raise. These are the things I have learned throughout this project and over the years of DIY.
TillM said:I must say, that the difference between my mic with the Haufe Transformer and the other one with the cinemag is nearly zero.
jrmintz said:Wow, that's unexpected. The difference between the Cinemag and the AMI is not subtle.
For anyone who's interested here is a comparison between my first DIY KM84 with the Cinemag transformer and also with the AMI: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/z4hcoqk8nprezza/AACrOkfG3ztepQpGmk3azS1ca?dl=0
Potato Cakes said:Are those with the same preamp gain settings? Besides the level difference, even on my not 100% Macbook Pro speakers I the difference is very much quite discernible.
Thanks!
Paul
jrmintz said:Yes, same preamp settings. It's a Neve 1064 with the EQ bypassed. It's hardly a carefully controlled scientific comparison, but it gets the point across.
maarvold said:I recorded a 24-96-Wave comparison on acoustic guitar of my 2 well-matched Neumann KM84's vs 2 builds of the DIY KM84. Couldn't be happier. If you want to check it for yourselves, download here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/evvmsf7d1wpns6y/Test%20DIY-Neumann%20KM84s.zip?dl=0
maarvold said:I recorded a 24-96-Wave comparison on acoustic guitar of my 2 well-matched Neumann KM84's vs 2 builds of the DIY KM84. Couldn't be happier. If you want to check it for yourselves, download here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/evvmsf7d1wpns6y/Test%20DIY-Neumann%20KM84s.zip?dl=0
fripholm said:Thanks for the comparison. I can't open ProTools sessions, so have to listen to the WAV files directly.
Audio 1_01.wav
Audio 2_01.wav
KM84_Red SN 51518Run 1.wav
KM84-Brn SN 32547 Run 1.wav
KM84-Brn SN 32547 run 2.wav
MC KM84 w C3 Is 1.5 uF run 2.wav
KM84 w 100 uF C3 -C4 run 3.wav
KM84-Brn SN 32547 run 3.wav
The file names doesn't make it obvious which ones are the DIY mics and which ones aren't. I'm noticing "Audio 1" and "Audio 2" are sounding dull compared to the rest. So, as long as this was not supposed to be a blind test, which one is which?
I'm also noticing a very narrow stereo field when two pairs are panned hard left and right. How was the placement of the mics?
maarvold said:Audio 1 & Audio 2 weren't meant to be included--sorry.
The ones with SN (serial number) in the name are real Neumann KM84's. SN32547 is the Control mic; the rest are considered Test mics and are compared, one at a time, to the Control. This is all explained in the ReadMe file I included; Unfortunately, it looks like my neatly-formatted file got a little weird-looking, but all the info is there and readable, in spite of the formatting.
I included the Pro Tools session in case it makes things more convenient for some. But the files can certainly be played directly in any DAW.
A narrow stereo field is the whole point--see the included JPG. Perfect mono would be even better, but the mics can't occupy the same physical space at the same time, so we have to settle for very close together.
maarvold said:Audio 1 & Audio 2 weren't meant to be included--sorry.
The ones with SN (serial number) in the name are real Neumann KM84's. SN32547 is the Control mic; the rest are considered Test mics and are compared, one at a time, to the Control. This is all explained in the ReadMe file I included; Unfortunately, it looks like my neatly-formatted file got a little weird-looking, but all the info is there and readable, in spite of the formatting.
I included the Pro Tools session in case it makes things more convenient for some. But the files can certainly be played directly in any DAW.
A narrow stereo field is the whole point--see the included JPG. Perfect mono would be even better, but the mics can't occupy the same physical space at the same time, so we have to settle for very close together.
Lamont Replevin said:I ordered two kits--finished one of them, biased it, it sounds dope. Clear, full, gorgeous, inspiring.
Problem! When i was biasing the second one i was careless and neglected to shut off the phantom power while turning the screw on the trim-pot. Aaaaand i must have short-circuited the whole thing with the screwdriver and fried something. I am pretty inexperienced, so i'm not sure how to diagnose what i blew up and so forth. The tip of the screwdriver must have just drifted to the next component... Anyway I think i may have blown the JFET because i get total continuity between the gate and source/drain with no power applied. I would heartily appreciate any tips on how to trouble-shoot the circuit. What else could i have blown? Am i right that continuity in the JFET means it's borked? Please use small words! I am not too bright, but very enthusiastic and appreciative.
Enter your email address to join: