jackymurda
Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2012
- Messages
- 13
hola compadres,
i've been thinkin on mic circuits a bit .. i'm not exactly an full blown electrical engineer. (i rebuilt a scully-westrex system some years back and cut for some years but now i just make and perform tunes.)
anyways i was wondering about some microphone designer's preference for the cathode follower/emitter follower topology. with cathode follower it would appear that we trade impedance matching and distortion elimination for a bit of extra noise by running the signal through an additional stage.. and we 'lose' the distortion characteristics of the older grounded plate circuit… it seems to me that the desired sound of the single stage amplifier is mostly due to the distortion characteristics inherent in that circuit style. so, the way that the circuit behaves when 'pushed', while not necessarily correct from a designers standpoint for linear response, is perceived as flattering to the result..
what y'alls thoughts?
i've been thinkin on mic circuits a bit .. i'm not exactly an full blown electrical engineer. (i rebuilt a scully-westrex system some years back and cut for some years but now i just make and perform tunes.)
anyways i was wondering about some microphone designer's preference for the cathode follower/emitter follower topology. with cathode follower it would appear that we trade impedance matching and distortion elimination for a bit of extra noise by running the signal through an additional stage.. and we 'lose' the distortion characteristics of the older grounded plate circuit… it seems to me that the desired sound of the single stage amplifier is mostly due to the distortion characteristics inherent in that circuit style. so, the way that the circuit behaves when 'pushed', while not necessarily correct from a designers standpoint for linear response, is perceived as flattering to the result..
what y'alls thoughts?