ladewd> 12VAC plug in wall transformer, then used an old 220VAC to 9V transformer and wired it backwards
How hot does that run?
Transformers have a voltage ratio, and your math is OK. But transformers also have a maximum voltage (for a given frequency). Feed them more voltage, and the iron saturates, large current flows, winding gets hot. There is some headroom above the rated voltage of a power transformer, but headroom is expensive so they only give you enough to cover likely line variations. Maybe 20%. You are running 33% over rated voltage ("9V" winding on 12V source). If both transformers are working cool, or just warm, OK. But if they run hot, you know why and what to do.
NewYorkDave> Increasing the feedback does reduce the output impedance, but there is an irreducible minimum load that a tube can drive to a given level regardless of the amount of feedback. This limit is imposed by the current-handling capability of the tube.
In any feedback amp, feedback changes the small-signal impedance but NOT the large-signal impedance. A 12AU7 is about a 6K source and should be loaded >12K. Wiring it as a cathode-follower gives 300Ω small-signal impedance; wrapping it with a 741 can give a 1Ω small-signal impedance, but the large-signal impedance is -still- 6K, best loaded >12K.
Working a small triode into 600Ω raises THD, though this can be "fixed" with NFB. But it is still a 6K large-signal source: load it in 600Ω and you get about 1/10 the voltage and power that you could get with an optimum load resistance. Since we sometimes need very-small power, a few mW, and they don't make very-small triodes (or not cheaper than the 1-watt 12A_7 series), this is often acceptable.
> 8.8K in series with a 100K pot. At minimum gain--with the pot shorted out--that low value of -fb resistor will load down the plate, but ...it can still do about 12VRMS...
Plausible. You are demanding about 2mA in the feedback net, which is no big load for that tube.
Note that open-loop without feedback and a more optimum load, that supply voltage would allow 40V RMS output at 5% THD. You have enough NFB going to keep the THD low up to the clip-point.
> A reverse-log pot would be preferable
Take another coffee-break, Dave. You know better. Consider an op-amp inverter with 1K fixed input resistor and 100K variable feedback resistor. Straight-audio taper gives approximately constant dB per knob-mark. Your non-inverting connection will bend at the low-gain end, and lack of ample NFB will bend the top, but mostly gain is proportional to feedback resistor and you want log-taper resistor to get log-taper control.
It is a bit tricky to set up, but you can run a PARAM sweep. Give the resistor a value-list like 0, 5K, 10K, 55K, 100K to see the gains for a 10%-taper pot at 5 settings 0∠, 68∠, 135∠, 203∠, 270∠ (where ∠ is the degree symbol that this board does not seem to support).
pstamler> also generates distortion with a lot of high harmonics
SPICE tube models I have seen just don't have enough terms to account for high-order non-linearity. If they did, they might run too slow for easy use. I would not say lying-ass: we give it a simplified description, it gives simplified answers. It isn't clear that an ideal tube will have large high-order THD (except grid-clipping) but real tubes with imperfectly wound grids sure do have high-order nonlinearities.
How hot does that run?
Transformers have a voltage ratio, and your math is OK. But transformers also have a maximum voltage (for a given frequency). Feed them more voltage, and the iron saturates, large current flows, winding gets hot. There is some headroom above the rated voltage of a power transformer, but headroom is expensive so they only give you enough to cover likely line variations. Maybe 20%. You are running 33% over rated voltage ("9V" winding on 12V source). If both transformers are working cool, or just warm, OK. But if they run hot, you know why and what to do.
NewYorkDave> Increasing the feedback does reduce the output impedance, but there is an irreducible minimum load that a tube can drive to a given level regardless of the amount of feedback. This limit is imposed by the current-handling capability of the tube.
In any feedback amp, feedback changes the small-signal impedance but NOT the large-signal impedance. A 12AU7 is about a 6K source and should be loaded >12K. Wiring it as a cathode-follower gives 300Ω small-signal impedance; wrapping it with a 741 can give a 1Ω small-signal impedance, but the large-signal impedance is -still- 6K, best loaded >12K.
Working a small triode into 600Ω raises THD, though this can be "fixed" with NFB. But it is still a 6K large-signal source: load it in 600Ω and you get about 1/10 the voltage and power that you could get with an optimum load resistance. Since we sometimes need very-small power, a few mW, and they don't make very-small triodes (or not cheaper than the 1-watt 12A_7 series), this is often acceptable.
> 8.8K in series with a 100K pot. At minimum gain--with the pot shorted out--that low value of -fb resistor will load down the plate, but ...it can still do about 12VRMS...
Plausible. You are demanding about 2mA in the feedback net, which is no big load for that tube.
Note that open-loop without feedback and a more optimum load, that supply voltage would allow 40V RMS output at 5% THD. You have enough NFB going to keep the THD low up to the clip-point.
> A reverse-log pot would be preferable
Take another coffee-break, Dave. You know better. Consider an op-amp inverter with 1K fixed input resistor and 100K variable feedback resistor. Straight-audio taper gives approximately constant dB per knob-mark. Your non-inverting connection will bend at the low-gain end, and lack of ample NFB will bend the top, but mostly gain is proportional to feedback resistor and you want log-taper resistor to get log-taper control.
It is a bit tricky to set up, but you can run a PARAM sweep. Give the resistor a value-list like 0, 5K, 10K, 55K, 100K to see the gains for a 10%-taper pot at 5 settings 0∠, 68∠, 135∠, 203∠, 270∠ (where ∠ is the degree symbol that this board does not seem to support).
pstamler> also generates distortion with a lot of high harmonics
SPICE tube models I have seen just don't have enough terms to account for high-order non-linearity. If they did, they might run too slow for easy use. I would not say lying-ass: we give it a simplified description, it gives simplified answers. It isn't clear that an ideal tube will have large high-order THD (except grid-clipping) but real tubes with imperfectly wound grids sure do have high-order nonlinearities.