Neve 1073 Relay Gain Control

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Bo Deadly

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Messages
3,266
Location
New Jersey, USA
I want to build a Neve mic pre. I'm currently looking at the 1073 "fullpak" schematic. I'm just doing the mic pre and not the EQ. It looks like I want the first circuit of the BA284 board for +30dB of gain and another +30dB from the first circuit of the BA283 board and then +20dB from the output driver circuit.

But instead of the cumbersome 3 pole 22 position rotary switch, I am going to use the following relay stepped gain control circuit:

Fc5xkZ2.png


With 7 relays I can make all 20 5dB steps (plus the 2 off steps using a mute relay elsewhere). As you can see, it's based on two attenuators that can each do 0, -5dB, -10dB and -15dB with 2 relays (the extra poles switching in R15 and R24 adjust for error when both relays are engaged for an accurate -15dB).

However, I have some concerns. This is not really an equivalent circuit so I am concerned about any unforeseen differences. Specifically, the source impedance presented to each gain stage input does not exactly match the real 1073 circuit. But the real circuit values vary pretty significantly from ~1k-9k and in the case of the line input stage much lower (< 100 ohms) whereas my circuit will reuse the second stepped attenuator for both the mic and line steps that use attenuation (will be using both Carnhill VTB9045M mic and VTB9046M line input transformers). Is the impedance of the line input transformer much lower because it can handle a much lower load (load looks like ~1k near as I can tell)? Does anyone see a problem with these source impedance differences? For example, the source impedance of the lowest step (confusingly labelled "+10dB") the source impedance is < 33 ohms whereas in my circuit it would end up being ~2.5k. Anyone see a problem with that?

Also, an aside, the relay driver will be all set for 8 relayI want to build a Neve mic pre. I'm currently looking at the 1073 "fullpak" schematic. I'm just doing the mic pre and not the EQ. It looks like I want the first circuit of the BA284 board for +30dB of gain and another +30dB from the first circuit of the BA283 board and then +20dB from the output driver circuit.

But instead of the cumbersome 4 pole 22 position rotary switch, I am going to use the following relay stepped gain control circuit:

With 7 relays I can make all 20 5dB steps (plus the 2 off steps using a mute relay elsewhere). As you can see, it's based on two attenuators that can each do 0, -5dB, -10dB and -15dB with 2 relays (the extra poles switching in R15 and R24 adjust for error when both relays are engaged for an accurate -15dB).

However, I have some concerns. This is not really an equivalent circuit so I am concerned about any unforseen differences. Specifcially, the source impedance presented to each gain stage input does not exactly match the real 1073 circuit. But the real circuit values vary pretty sigificantly from ~1k-9k and in the case of the line input stage much lower (< 100 ohms) whereas my circuit will reuse the second stepped attenuator for both the mic and line steps that use attenuation. Is the impedance of the line input transformer much lower because it can handle a much lower load (~1k near as I can tell)? Does anyone see a problem with these source impedance differences? For example, the source impedance of the lowest step (confusingly labelled "+10dB" in the Neve schematic) the source impedence is < 33 ohms whereas in my circuit it would end up being ~2.5k. Anyone see a problem with that?

Also, an aside, the relay driver will be all set for 8 relays but so far I've only used 7. So I have an extra relay. It would be nice if I could devise a 2.5dB step that works independently of any of the other steps so that I can effectively double the number of steps (40 2.5dB steps). Anyone have any ideas about how to add a + or - 2.5dB relay to this circuit? It needs to work independantly of any of the other steps of course.

Or perhaps you can suggest a better method entirely?
 
I tried this a couple of years ago, 7 relays, an Arduino and a lorlin 16 position coded switch.
The only problem was that the cheap lorlin I used sent out some ghost data between steps. Otherwice it worked perfect.
Just a plain switch and a diode matrix can also be used.
 
The mic input uses a 1:2 step up transformer so it needs a load around 4K8 so the primary 'looks like' 1K2 to a mic. The line input uses a 31267 transformer wired 10K:600 so it needs a load of  about 600 ohms so the primary 'looks like' about 10K. If you vary the transformer load, the impedance reflected to the primary will vary. You probably don't want this.

Cheers

Ian
 
Here's another pass at this:
FWHOO6k.png

My previous circuit is actually wrong because the lowest 10dB would require cascading the two sections so the error correction doesn't work. So this circuit takes advantage of the fact that the gain select of the BA283 is not used with the attenuation. So I can add a 2.5dB attenuator and a 1.3dB gain select boost to achive 1.3dB resolution. Then I can just do error correction in code. Some quick and dirty simulations suggest that error could be limited to less than 0.5dB actually even with 2.5dB steps.

So it uses all 8 relays but I get 2.5dB resolution so I can use a switch or I think I will just use a conventional potentiometer and hijack one of the VU meters to display stepping changes (with the usual debouncing code to eliminate spurious changes).

As for the load impedance on the transformers, the attenuators are 4-5k just like in the stock circuit, which incidentally does not appear to have any such load for the highest 10 positions or so (but I'm not certain what the input impedance of the first circuit in the BA284 board is), and for the line input transformer I can just add a 600R across the secondary (now shown).

So again, I'm just looking for general advice. Does this look sane?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top