I've had quite enough of this stuff.
I'm going to apologise for calling you a dipshit. That wasn't good for anything.
Here however are a few facts that
I challenge you to classify as incorrect:
1) The very first response after your mention of effort (from Greg) makes a distinction between "effort" and "difficulty" which is in more or less precise agreement with my posted thought.
2) Something which is "difficult" usually requires a particular skill to overcome or achieve. This is different and quite distinct from "effort".
3) I said that I thought that -in confusing the two distinct semantic meanings- you are rather flattering yourself. That's not an insult, it is an opinion. I'll give you some more opinions later if you like, but they're not insults. Therefore I did not start the insult-tossing. -When I read your insulting response, I was so incensed (witness the bad typing... -worse than usual!) that my response ending with a single word insult. I now apologise for this. -I felt that your post tone was uncalled for, and I still do.... but I WILL NOT me characterised as having started the insult throwing, and I will not sink to it again. Instead I am responding with fact-based replies that are open to legitimate challenge.
4)My contention was -and still is- that what you are defending in terms of your own undisputed efforts, is assembling kits. Peter C did the adaption of the original design by Rup-ert Ne-ve, and that took some work on his part. He then went on and developed it, adding local metering and redrawing the board to incorporate certain other mechanically advantageous features, -like using the pots, switches and LEDs to help locate the board against the front panel, reducing the wiring complexity... Then he shared it freely. not for sale, and not for profit. Not for personal gain, but out of the kindness of his heart, and generosity of his spirit.
5) You, I, and a good number of people here on this board could train an 18-year old school-leaver to source parts and assemble them into kits. It may indeed be tedious, but it's not rocket science; -
Rocket science is "difficult".
Here is another opinion for people to consider: the vast majority of your posts that I recall are to do with your personal gain. You use other people's work and profit from it.
You
sell PCBs of other people's designs. You
ask others for help, and you
sell kits of other people's work.
Now it's my opinion that this really takes the 'Y' out of "DIY". -This isn't Do-It-Yourself, this is paint-by-numbers. That's what some people want, and so that's okay. It's like the Bloo LA-2a's, -more my idea of enterprise than of DIY. I don't sell stuff here, but I do share my designs. I've redrawn and adapted other existing designs like the 9K pre, in a similar way to how Peter has done things. I've also come up with more original stuff, like the output balancing board, the ±18V & +48V power supply board, and I've never made so much as one red cent out of it. -Now I think
THAT is more difficult. That does take a certain skill, and no less patience and effort.
I've had a search through your posts, and the majority are connected with you selling things, or closely connected with things that you sell. That is very much against the spirit of sharing which sets this grou apart from so many others. I can't easily find ANY posts where you help solve anyone else's electronic problems, be they design, construction or repair. -Maybe you can post a link here and help me out a little?
Otherwise, I'll be forced to run with the opinion that you're here to help yourself out more than help others. -I mean... come..
ON!!! -Selling Neutrik XLRs??? -Who the hell can't find
them for themself? -Oh, and the number of "rolling eyes" emoticons in your posts is rather telling. -That really IS the attitude that you have when you post a lot of these things here, isn't it?
My Name is Keith, and I stand by the numbered facts which I've written above. Correction -in public- is welcomed.