Roman Beilharz
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2023
- Messages
- 90
Thank you kinglok, did you order PSU PCBs? Maybe they have run out of supplies - I don't know and Chunger doesn't answer
This would be great too, if you'd be willing to sell them. Especially since you're in Europe.I started laying out a pcb based on the schematics that changer has published, but have not had time to get it finished.
Thanks for the heads up!I realistically won't get anything done and certainly not tested before April next year.
That looks like a very small footprint for a 4700uF/25V cap. I don't think you'd find that value with a smaller lead space than 7,5mm.c10 is a 5mm cap
but what came with the kit is a 15mm
Yeah! If there wasn't a chance of the PCB to be back in stock any time soon, I'd highly appreciate Matachung to publish their data for others to order on-demand PCBs.Thanks for the heads up!
Since this PCB is almost ten years old, maybe they'd consider releasing the PCB layout, or have someone else produce them. There's clearly demand for it, and there's not a lot of other options out there that are this simple to implement.
As I see there is a V. 1.5 of 2023 of this board, this project doesn't look like old news, though, indeed, and was great to have available again. Man, I am so stuck with thishas anyone worked with the 1.5a vrs. of this pcb
c10 is a 5mm cap
but what came with the kit is a 15mm
mouser or digikey doesn't carry a 5 mm 4700uf 25v elec. cap
any ideas?
I've tried contacting chunger
Apologies for the confusion. This is due to a BOM change between 1.4 and 1.5(a).has anyone worked with the 1.5a vrs. of this pcb
c10 is a 5mm cap
but what came with the kit is a 15mm
mouser or digikey doesn't carry a 5 mm 4700uf 25v elec. cap
any ideas?
I've tried contacting chunger
TI 317 datasheet said:C0 improves transient response, but is not needed for stability.
Good Morning, Matador …Apologies for the confusion. This is due to a BOM change between 1.4 and 1.5(a).
The original board was designed to be configurable between a passive heater supply (e.g. simple RC filtering), and an active heater supply (the LM317). After all of the hundreds of people that use the psu, exactly zero of them ever wanted to use a passive heater supply.
Since it took up so much of the board space, I reduced the final capacitor from 4700uF (intended for the passive supply), to a 10uF/25V. However for an active supply, this capacitance isn't needed as the heater load is essentially constant current, and the datasheet recommends an output capacitor "to improve transient response":
In short, you can just leave it out.
If you need lower B+, then you need higher R1 and R2. It's hard to pre-suppose what the current requirements are exactly: I would swap either R1 or R2 with a 250K pot, then set the trimmer resistor R4 to mid-value, and tweak the pot until you get down to 105. Then add together R1 and the pot value, divide by 2, then you have the required values for R1 and R2.I recently built a pair of Dan’s D-67’s using your Universal Tube PSU’s (with R1 and R2 changed to 18K) … and it works great !!!
This week … I finished a pair of Dan’s D-EF47’s and also tried using your Universal Tube PSU’s … but I wasn’t sure what value R1 and R2 would need to be changed to get B+ down to the required 105V (the 5.05 Heater voltage was not a problem) …
Thank you, Matador …If you need lower B+, then you need higher R1 and R2. It's hard to pre-suppose what the current requirements are exactly: I would swap either R1 or R2 with a 250K pot, then set the trimmer resistor R4 to mid-value, and tweak the pot until you get down to 105. Then add together R1 and the pot value, divide by 2, then you have the required values for R1 and R2.
As for Dany's design, I'm not familiar with it, so you'd have to seek support from him.
Hello. I'm also pretty much ready to build my tube mic but was hoping to do it with the Chunger Universal PSU. As I don't see it on the 939 website, I am looking for something else similar so I can get started. I saw you opened a dedicated thread about this where you mentioned that you were able to find a comparable alternative. I was meaning to ask you if you could refer me to it, but the forum says I don't have enough privileges to answer in that specific thread, and I can't figure out how to DM people here. I've been using the forum extensively for research but never actively engaged with anything or anyone, so I apologize if I'm not getting it fully.As I see there is a V. 1.5 of 2023 of this board, this project doesn't look like old news, though, indeed, and was great to have available again. Man, I am so stuck with this
Thank you!Hi Luca,
I am not sure about rules and privileges so I am not sure you are allowed to PM the user TLRT. He could provide a very well done similar PCB with nicely printed values/part descriptions on top. Try to use this link and mail him.
Good luck, my best
Ro
Enter your email address to join: