Howdy,
Thanks to the helpful folks here, my NFB issues are resolved. Now I need help deciding how to configure the gain in a most user-friendly way.
We've got two tube gain stages with a basic rotary switch attenuator between them. The first tube stage seems to work very well with up to 18dB of NFB as a gain control. Thus allowing condenser mics to be used on the input without "having" to pad it down. Of course, there is still a typical -20dB switchable pad if needed.
I now have some options to consider with the engineer in mind:
Option 1: Two rotary switches (similar to attached photos). "Input" adjusts the NFB to reduce the first gain stage. "Gain" or "Level" or "Atten" is the between stage.
Option 2: One rotary "gain" switch, combination mid-stage attenuator and NFB adjust. For example, max gain would have no NFB for full 60dB gain. The lowest gain would have the most NFB. This could be similar to the Gyraf G9 where part of the switch covers attenuation while the other positions adjust NFB.
Biggest drawbacks:
Option 1. Users may overdrive the front end without realizing it. This could be helped by making the -6dB NFB actually be centered at "0" (see picture).
Option 2. It takes the power to shape harmonics and saturation out of the user's hand.
Curious to know what everyone thinks.
Thanks to the helpful folks here, my NFB issues are resolved. Now I need help deciding how to configure the gain in a most user-friendly way.
We've got two tube gain stages with a basic rotary switch attenuator between them. The first tube stage seems to work very well with up to 18dB of NFB as a gain control. Thus allowing condenser mics to be used on the input without "having" to pad it down. Of course, there is still a typical -20dB switchable pad if needed.
I now have some options to consider with the engineer in mind:
Option 1: Two rotary switches (similar to attached photos). "Input" adjusts the NFB to reduce the first gain stage. "Gain" or "Level" or "Atten" is the between stage.
Option 2: One rotary "gain" switch, combination mid-stage attenuator and NFB adjust. For example, max gain would have no NFB for full 60dB gain. The lowest gain would have the most NFB. This could be similar to the Gyraf G9 where part of the switch covers attenuation while the other positions adjust NFB.
Biggest drawbacks:
Option 1. Users may overdrive the front end without realizing it. This could be helped by making the -6dB NFB actually be centered at "0" (see picture).
Option 2. It takes the power to shape harmonics and saturation out of the user's hand.
Curious to know what everyone thinks.