Dear forum members,
I'm currently planning my patchbay - and I have to deal with various connections, including unbalanced to balanced and balanced to unbalanced.
I'm going to follow the Rane interconnection schemes described here:
http://www.rane.com/note110.html
My question is: What if I connect all devices to (a rear of) the patchbay using cables with a direct standard wiring (TRS-TRS for balanced equipment and TS-TS for unbalanced equipment) and then make all balanced/unbalanced "conversions" between these devices by using custom patch cords, wired accordingly to the Rane article?
In other words, I consider the patchbay sockets as a "direct replication" of devices' sockets. And the patch cords - as cables, connecting these devices.
Does it look like a correctly working solution or am I missing something?
P.S. In this case, the patchbay have to be in a through mode (de-normalled) and I will need a good amount of various custom patch cords, but that's fine to me.
Thank you,
Gregory
I'm currently planning my patchbay - and I have to deal with various connections, including unbalanced to balanced and balanced to unbalanced.
I'm going to follow the Rane interconnection schemes described here:
http://www.rane.com/note110.html
My question is: What if I connect all devices to (a rear of) the patchbay using cables with a direct standard wiring (TRS-TRS for balanced equipment and TS-TS for unbalanced equipment) and then make all balanced/unbalanced "conversions" between these devices by using custom patch cords, wired accordingly to the Rane article?
In other words, I consider the patchbay sockets as a "direct replication" of devices' sockets. And the patch cords - as cables, connecting these devices.
Does it look like a correctly working solution or am I missing something?
P.S. In this case, the patchbay have to be in a through mode (de-normalled) and I will need a good amount of various custom patch cords, but that's fine to me.
Thank you,
Gregory