MikeClev said:
I think the theory is that you get 3dB (or is it 6dB?) lower noise for each doubling of the number of VCAs used in parallel? Perhaps better distortion figures too?
The theory is that there is a difference between how you add correlated and uncorrelated distortions and noise.
Correlated voltages and currents add up as you'd expect. So 2 VCA's in parallel give twice the signal current out.
Non-correlated Gaussian noise voltages and currents add up as power (due to the so called "random walk" effect).
Since power is proportional to current (or voltage) squared, 2 VCA's in parallel will only have sqrt(2) = 1.414 * the noise current of one VCA.
So any systematic problems and distortions will not improve (if all chips have a hump in the frequency response at 300Hz, or a non-linearity in the compression at a particular control voltage, so will the combo).
Random manufacturing distortions and noise problems will improve by 2/sqrt(2) when doubling the number of parallel units.
So four chips in parallel should increase the signal to noise ratio by a factor of 4/sqrt(4) = 2 = 6dB all other things being equal.
This is more of a replacement for a 202x (8 * 2150 VCA chips in parallel) than a 202C gold can (which was built on discrete transistors)