good it does work then. also did you just use the four possition switch or did you figure what the values would be for more stages? i just got two and so i am kind of excited.
i'm trying to gather all the info i need to finally rack mines...but i have a question if i usae a rotary switch for steped gain is there anyway i should be able to install an output trimmer?? or should i use a 50K rev Log instead?
thanks.
Used to have a studio rack FILLED with these things.
3 dozen or more SS 101's, and sad to say, without consulting me,
the whole rack went to a landfill decades ago.
I was sad then and sadder now...
It was out of a rebuilt Flickenger console.
Or maybe the SS were the rebuild new parts.
As to the feedback gain question a simple 25k linear pot
would easily replace the resister choices I think.
Personally I would use a 50K.
put it in and run it with a scope
and mark your DB points on a scale.
Nothing really says it needs to be fixed.
Likely pre 1970...
The're cool,
but the same thing is smaller than your fingernail these days.
And likely cleaner. But they are still interesting
and should have a defined sound.
Only listening will decide if this is a good sound for you.
IMHO.
I find it interesting that so many are looking to the tech of the past,
to create the sounds for tomorrow. I still love tubes.
I'd say try a much lower voltage like 5v and see what's happening around
the circuit WITHOUT smoking it. Gradually bring it up and check voltages/current etc.
IIRC the circuit in the patent featured a few Ge-transistor types, yet most/all implementations here use all-Si. Anybody knows more ? Maybe most of the real-world boards had Si perhaps ?
Hah, maybe they had already switched to all-Si by the time the patent was granted (1968) :wink:
From the patent I get the impression that at the time of writing (1965) the choice for Ge or Si was partly influenced by the cost of the one over the other, who knows that might have been the main reason... ?