I assume you're referring only to their LDC capsules - the NT45-O omni SDC is an excellent capsule.Røde capsules are some of the worst I have tried. You could replace it with any decent capsule and improve the sound of your mic.
A great example of how polarizing this topic can be. I, for example, like that capsule very much. It is flatter (less HF boost) and more balanced than most capsules of this type available. Since it's Røde, it is highly consistent from piece to piece, back to front. It's the one found in Classic II. It is not to be mistaken for the original CK12 type though.Anyone familiar with Rode HF1 capsule ?
Is it worth the money?
How does to compare to order OEM edge terminated capsule available at market ?
Cheers
I may be thinking of the original edge terminated capsule.A great example of how polarizing this topic can be. I, for example, like that capsule very much. It is flatter (less HF boost) and more balanced than most capsules of this type available. Since it's Røde, it is highly consistent from piece to piece, back to front. It's the one found in Classic II. It is not to be mistaken for the original CK12 type though.
And now I'm thinking about grabbing a pair of NT2000s.The red one is HF1 against two other OEM capsules of the same type. Disregard the quirks around 50hz, the capsules are measured nude without any shielding hence inconsistencies at that frequency.
EDIT:
Like any other capsule, the body/headbasket/circuit will impact how this capsule comes across. So if you've heard it in a less than ideal body, or wrong context this could be the reason you didn't like it.
It lives in between the worlds. Not bright as a k67, or scooped as ck12. Not dark enough used in flat circuit to be compared to u67, u87. Nothing in common with k47. It is actually closest to Shure ksm44. This mic suffers from same critiques, clean, it doesn't fit any of the previously mentioned stereotypes. Yet a great mic in it's own right.
I have Nt2A, and i sold my KSM44, as i felt it would be redundant. If appreciated for what these are, low noise, clean, high headroom mics, I can certainly see use for them.And now I'm thinking about grabbing a pair of NT2000s.
I'm interested in the NT2000 as a cheap (I plan to buy used) clean utility mic that's a little closer to what I want than the CAD M179 is, though I guess I could always just throw new capsules in those.I have Nt2A, and i sold my KSM44, as i felt it would be redundant. If appreciated for what these are, low noise, clean, high headroom mics, I can certainly see use for them.
If capsule is used in some other circuit some dirt could make them more lively. The Classic II is actually the only one that uses plate out topology in combo with this capsule, and offers some dirt. Could be the reason it's popular. Other Rode tube mics are cathode out, and very clean. I also can see how they can be used in u87 circuit with less HF attenuation is used.
I have even made a variant with RLC filter to gently dip the midrange and make these sound more CK12 like. Maybe -2db at 1K.
Don't think they need reskin, just some cleaning. If that's all the gold missing from the diaphragm, it's not that bad.Hi again,
I have 2 old capsules taken for NT2 A in bad condition.
Think it’s HF 1 model .
Is there someone in EU who could reskinning? It’s shame to have them to go waisted.
Thanks
View attachment 109514
Hi,Don't think they need reskin, just some cleaning. If that's all the gold missing from the diaphragm, it's not that bad.
some time ago i found this video. For creating alcohol solution possible use some vodka from shop. Isopropyl alcohol is not recommended
some time ago i found this video. For creating alcohol solution possible use some vodka from shop. Isopropyl alcohol is not recommended
Enter your email address to join: