Rouge Un - a red preamp featuring Lundahl , 5534 & pumpkin output

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Yes my description was confusing, let me rephrase it: on one deck you switch attenuation before the opamp for the 5 first positions then for 6 to 11 you change resistor value around the opamp ( feedback loop) on the second deck ( and bypass any attenuation happening before the opamp), the last 12th position is unused/blank.

It's unusual approach to use attenuation before entering opamp. I remember many old time members being sckeptical about this as it have a potential 'to suck sound' ( whatever it means) iirc. Never been bothered by this in use with the 430mk2 i had access to in studio, so i don't know if concerns were legitimate. Neve did things his own way anyway and he probably have some very valid reason to do so...

I think the switch needs to be mbb but it's been a while since i had a 430 opened in front of me so i might be wrong about it?
 
Last edited:
For ultimate p*rn I was mostly concerned with finding originals TDA1034N for the first stage 😏

Re the switch, I’ll prototype and report back one of these days.
Doesn’t seem strange to attenuate before gain, it’s commonly done with tube designs for instance, and Rupert’s early solid state designs are inspired by / take roots in tube design : transformer isolation and general topology / design blocks
 
For ultimate p*rn I was mostly concerned with finding originals TDA1034N for the first stage 😏

Re the switch, I’ll prototype and report back one of these days.
Doesn’t seem strange to attenuate before gain, it’s commonly done with tube designs for instance, and Rupert’s early solid state designs are inspired by / take roots in tube design : transformer isolation and general topology / design blocks

Hi Thomas, why 1034N? This is what was used into the desk? I was pretty sure it was 553x, but i might be wrong.

Tube/opamp topology: tube are high input Z, 553X are not. It make a difference in that case imho. If you take a look at other 'classic' 5534 with input transfo console you won't find any with attenuation implemented this way ( no Ssl, no Ams/Neve, so far no Amek either ( afaik),...).
If you know of other circuit sharing this kind of topology with opamps then i'm all hears.
 
Hi Thomas, why 1034N? This is what was used into the desk? I was pretty sure it was 553x, but i might be wrong.

Tube/opamp topology: tube are high input Z, 553X are not. It make a difference in that case imho. If you take a look at other 'classic' 5534 with input transfo console you won't find any with attenuation implemented this way ( no Ssl, no Ams/Neve, so far no Amek either ( afaik),...).
If you know of other circuit sharing this kind of topology with opamps then i'm all hears.
True !
I was thinking of early transistors designs with in & out transformers and fixed gain from the likes of RCA, Langevin & such, which are based on tube designs blocks, and where input attenuation before gain is very common.
Re the TDA1034N : word on the street is it based on a Rupert Neve opamp design. It then evolved into the NE5534 and they can be swapped, though they have different cases
Some people whom ears I trust told me the TDA 1034 sounded "better" or more "interesting" especially at high gain settings, so I'm curious to hear one some day and I am seriously thinking of allowing some space on the PCB to use either a 1034 or a 5534, kind of paying tribute to the man behind the original design :) I am a sentimental guy, I know, I know..
 
The Grayhill 71 series has nice PCB versions and are well regarded. These days the 2x12 configurations are rarely stocked, but often they can be ordered in quantities of 25 or more.
That's good to know... maybe we'll get into another feeler or even a group buy then haha
 
Back
Top