Ricardus
WILL SOLDER FOR FOOD
The SSL9000 preamp board that Gustav sells uses a Tant in the meter driver circuit. I always wondered why.
The one which makes the music have more pulling power, lowers listener fatigue and makes listening more pleasant overall. It’s art, I supposeWhen you hear a difference which one is correct?
JR
Maybe figure out what that is, then figure out how to make more of it.The one which makes the music have more pulling power, lowers listener fatigue and makes listening more pleasant overall. It’s art, I suppose
Dramatic failures is a bit of an under-statement. Fire hazard liability risk is more accurate.
Really nobody is using regular tantalum capacitors for modern designs these days, except in very niche applications. If you use them in a commercial design, you'd better make damn well sure you understand their failure modes in the context of your application and you cover it thoroughly during product validation. Otherwise, make damn well sure you've got good lawyers on hand!
more like spectacular failures with light show, but mainly when used across a power rail without current limiting.Dramatic failures is a bit of an under-statement. Fire hazard liability risk is more accurate.
While not these days, and I've probably shared this story too many times, but the last time I designed in a tantalum cap was back in the 80s, when Popular Electronics offered me a cover story for a kit article if I became a CX licensee and cranked out a kit design overnight. CX was CBS's ill fated noise reduction system for vinyl. I used exactly one tantalum capacitor in the playback expander side chain time constant circuit, because I observed that the encoder/compressor (designed by Urie) used a tantalum in their side chain. One notable characteristic of tantalum is lousy dielectric absorption, which mainly matters in sample and hold circuits, or side chain time constants.Really nobody is using regular tantalum capacitors for modern designs these days, except in very niche applications. If you use them in a commercial design, you'd better make damn well sure you understand their failure modes in the context of your application and you cover it thoroughly during product validation. Otherwise, make damn well sure you've got good lawyers on hand!
Maybe figure out what that is, then figure out how to make more of it.
Those don't sound like objective metrics. While lots of sounds are unpleasant, and some distortion is associated with listener fatigue. But you did say it is art which is considered subjective.
JR
A person with two wristwatches never knows what time it is <g>.When you hear a difference which one is correct?
JR
Could be for timing functions: A property of the tantalum capacitors is that they are relatively stable over time regarding capacitance, so they can be used in timing functions that shouldn't change too much over time. This also why they have a place in e.g. the GSSL sidechainThe SSL9000 preamp board that Gustav sells uses a Tant in the meter driver circuit. I always wondered why.
market research?Well, when it comes to intelligibility, sound quality etc. people like the engineers at Neumann, I have been told, spent a lot of time listening.
How do you quantify the 'right amount' of presence peak in a capsule, or the 'right amount' of directional high frequency response?
less noise and less distortion is generally considered an audio path improvement.Assuming that every time you try and improve (remove) distortion and noise figures, there is a tradeoff and a change in the overall sound, it's always a (personal) choice as to what is the best compromise, IMO.
Can you post a link or a relevant fragment of schematic?The SSL9000 preamp board that Gustav sells uses a Tant in the meter driver circuit. I always wondered why.
Indeed.The graphs don't tell the whole story. The TI INA1650 high-CMRR dual line receiver evaluation board uses 10uF 35V X7R 1206 ceramic caps on its inputs with excellent results. High impedance and low cutoff frequency can allow the use of high-K ceramic caps while still providing low distortion.
Today, the use of dirtifiers seems to be an obligatory step for compensating the lack of substance of many tracks. Such substance should be built in the studio, but how many recordings are actually done in a studio today?The use of added distortion as a vocal enhancement (exciter) effect is pretty old news. I recall decades ago when these were first used and overused, that I would try to tune in my FM radio stations better, to clean up the audio signal.
These are "linear distortions", they don't add harmonics to the spectrum. Just like using the tone control on a phonograph, it's perfectly legitimate to "tune" these effects.Well, when it comes to intelligibility, sound quality etc. people like the engineers at Neumann, I have been told, spent a lot of time listening.
How do you quantify the 'right amount' of presence peak in a capsule, or the 'right amount' of directional high frequency response?
Indeed. The German designers submitted their products to the likes of Karajan, Furtwangler, Klemperer for final tuning, even if it was not perfectly aligned with their objective measurements.Assuming that every time you try and improve (remove) distortion and noise figures, there is a tradeoff and a change in the overall sound, it's always a (personal) choice as to what is the best compromise, IMO.
Yes.Can you post a link or a relevant fragment of schematic?