That api 553 circuit is very nice when it's done well.
In my case, with a 1ru 'dual mono' version with relay-bypass added, I found that inductor shielding is very 'nice to have' [ie. critically important].
After I had tamed the inductor hum, I found this eq to 'do the job' nearly 'most of the time'.
The bass is quite responsive and works great either way - boost or cut; the high band is quite 'airy' and mostly I use it to cut high freqs
... I do think one needs to check the 'break frequencies' and so on, to suit one's own taste and what with whatever 'inductor' variation you might have over the original.
The mid freq was quite tricky to keep 'away' from the low and hi bands, once one starts messing with different inductors etc.
So, some patience is required in 'scaling' of some of the R and C values to suit one's part choices (pot law is important here I think) .. somewhat 'by ear' as well as by 'calc' and by 'measurement' [ the 3 Rs of audio eng]
And finally, I think good quality potentiometers and switches is a good idea .... I like 'alps' pots in general, both single deck and dual deck .... you can get 'stereo' with such (and 2x compact 553 style eqs) with a good chance of success [imho - which not always a given for stereo eqs].
I ended making two of these 'dual channel api-ish 553 eq' boxes and funnily enough, I use them all the time with my own 'neve-e style 1272' build ... as well as my 'gyraf 1176 style' build
That makes it 2x channels of 'preamp-eq-lim' otherwise known as 'channel strips' , for quite modest cost ..
Certainly the 553eq is a great example of it's kind - easy to use 'in the moment' eqs [very important in a stereo mix-down context ... each hand, grab a knob, both sides and turn together till sound is good-er]
Anyway - fab - carry on!