Science fiction can be a good vehicle to explore possible futures... I'll wait for the paperback.TwentyTrees said:It's truly terrifying (though perhaps not surprising) that a tool with such potential to democratise information is being used on such a scale to control it in this way. Currently reading Neal Stephenson's latest 'Fall, or Dodge In Hell', and the way he handles misinformation and the rise of fake news on both sides of the political equation - and potential tech solutions - is very much on the nose.
As with everything - follow the money.
cyrano said:Don't forget that IBM experiment. IBM set up two different AI instances to talk to each other. The first thing that happened was that they developed their own language that still can't be understood by humans.
IBM was wise enough to pull the plug. Now imagine the military running the same experiment...
The recent episode of Dr Who (who?) used a twist on that where humans were being used by aliens for mass storage encoding data into their DNA... Not very good sci fi, but perhaps teaching a little about the potential data content in DNA.dmp said:AI has developed specific intelligence for things like Chess or Go and most importantly consumer manipulation (and voters). But developing artificial generalized intelligence is not here yet or even close, based on evidence. But it does make for great science fiction.
Things that are simple to humans are still difficult or impossible for computers (such as facial recognition, language recognition especially analogy, metaphor, and multiple means of the same word). Although no doubt AI has been improving rapidly as computational power becomes more available.
The deep learning algorithms used to win chess / go (alphazero / alphago) were deep neural networks with a depth and width on the order of 40. Meaning there were order ~1600 nodes that were trained with a traditional CPU type computer. Larger networks are prohibitive as the computation complexity is scaling with a power of the number of nodes.
In contrast, the human brain is estimated to have 86 BILLION neurons that operate as a decentralized biological computational device (non-john von neumann type computer, cellular automata). We don't even understand how these types of networks work for sophisticated tasks.
The human brain is really the most impressive piece of technology known to exist (to use the term 'technology' loosely).
In the original draft for the Matrix that humans were used for the computational power of the brain, not as energy generation devices, but they decided to dumb-down the script. Ironic.
JohnRoberts said:the potential data content in DNA.
Voting has been suppressed / manipulated for decades. From suppression with polling obstacles to negative targeted ads. I'm not sure the improved prediction of voting habits is going to be a game changer. Republicans have known for decades that minorities will vote against them, so they made it hard for them to vote - that's just a fact.Tubetec said:CA figured out how to predict with a high rate of accuracy the way people are likely to vote, using special algorithms to look at facebook data and speech to text software embedded in phone apps, after that it becomes like shooting fish in a barrel .
Enter your email address to join: