Sound vs. Components

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
hulk-

more so with mic pre's but one thing to think about with component selection is where the components are sitting in the circuit wth regards to amplifier stages. Anything that gets passed through an inputt transformer in a mic pre gets amplified HUGE amounts, so whatever color you pick up on the way in is going to be made bigger. If you have a line input transformer into a circuit running at unity, there's less amplification, so less of the transformer sound is being amplified. Of course, you can get a line transformer with tons of color that will color the box at unity more than another mic input transformer will with 70dB of gain following it, but its something to think about.

Carbon Comp resistors have a rep for being noisy, if you use all metal film resistors in a box, but use carbon comp on the input and first opamp in a dual opamp circuit, you are going to hear more noise I would think than if you use metal film on the amplifier stages and then carbon comp on the tail once you've done the bulk of your amplifying. Same holds true for audio coupling caps. You might want to use something like an FC throughout the entire circuit to get as much high end going on as possible and then use an output coupling cap that wont pass as much high end material. I bet if you built a box like that, your imaging would be different thhan if you used midrange sensitive caps throughout with a top sensitive output coupling cap. Im not suggesting one way is better than another, merely that it may amount to a difference.

There are broad strokes to be painted for sure, but Ive found it helpful to look at where the amplifiication is happening and mak decisions based around that.

hopefully this makes some sense and isnt confusing.

dave
 
[quote author="soundguy"] You might want to use something like an FC throughout the entire circuit to get as much high end going on as possible and then use an output coupling cap that wont pass as much high end material. [/quote]

What is a FC??
 
[quote author="Hulk"][quote author="soundguy"] You might want to use something like an FC throughout the entire circuit to get as much high end going on as possible and then use an output coupling cap that wont pass as much high end material. [/quote]

What is a FC??[/quote]

A family of capacitors, manufactured by Panasonic (Matsushita). The line is optimized for low equivalent series resistance and long life, at the expense of higher inductance.

Back to the original question: I go along with the original list, but would add somewhere near the top "linearity of active devices".

Peace,
Paul
 
time for my 2 cents

my first ever pro audio DIY project I ever built was a stereo LA2A unit.
changing poly caps made great sonic changes. but the biggest change I got was when a friend gave me 2 old expensive pots from a broadcast console - it was like taking an EQ off the monitors! however generally we dont have a wide choice of audio pots these days and most things are standardised and al sound pretty much the same. AB pots have a really nice smooth sound but not many around.
to my ears ICs are more brittle than tube and discrete devices.
thing with DIY is that if you want to clone a unit accurately you have to be real close to the original. I'm a great fan of old transformers - even though they dont have the spec of the new ones they sound more 'iron' if that makes sense. there is a roll off but it has its purpose in recording.
changing caps in EQs makes a huge difference.
Mullard, Telefunken, Philips valves all have different strengths.
I have an original class A 1176 and my own class A clone. they are pretty close but I would say the new transformer from UAudio is more open and the metal film resistors make mine noticeably brighter.
even when I changed an EQ pot on my 1073 it really changed the sound. not better or worse just different

I think the biggest thing about this is that it is subjective. and also not maths and science - its about suck it and see for yourself.
 
Back
Top