[quote author="FredForssell"]The orginal 610 used Triad A-67J (or 65) input transformers and an HS-66 output transformer. While the HS-66 isn't too bad, the A-67/65J sucked big-time IMO. That could be part of the HPF sound someone mentioned earilier.
It also used a really nice API-361 VU meter (that cost a fortune) and the SS 101 card which used +24 VDC rail. That card was later replaced in other SS designs with the SS 110 card which used +/- 24 VDC rails. But if I remember correctly each of these cards had 604 ohm input impedances due to the fact that they used grounded base input stages. The single-ended power supply and low input impedance mean one needs to use large value caps for inter-stage coupling. That is not something that can change if you use the SS 101 or 110 cards, so I'd look at using something other the SS amplifiers.
Basically, if I were going to make a 610 clone, I wouldn't. I'd make it with the 601 and 603 cards (good meter tracking vs ratio setting), a good output/gain make-up amp (guess what I'd use), and better transformers on the input and output. And I'd try to DC couple it from input xformer to output xformer. But then again, I'd get rid of the input transformer and used a balanced to single-ended input stage. That's me.
I think it would be interesting to see what that sounded like. I actually liked the way the 610 worked but not how it sounded... so much. Because it has the ability to work at such high slope ratios (100:1, if I remember correctly) people tended to have trouble setting it up properly. Typically they ended up saying it "pumped" too much. Go figure.[/quote]
Do you ever make it down to Ogden, UT where SpecraSonics and Ray Kimber are located? I haven't been up to Ray's yet, but I hear he has a bunch of old SpectrSonics stuff. It might be fun to go through his basement and see what can be done with some of that stuff. He would probably be up for it. He was sure excited when he saw the rack of 12 SpectraSonics amplifiers that I have at my shop.
Cheers,
Zach