The Ultimate M49

Help Support GroupDIY:

ln76d

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2012
Messages
2,486
Location
Gallifrey
Khron said:
Nothing personal, it's just that "absolute" declarations along the lines of "this is the (only) right way (because i say so)" kinda tickle me the wrong way ;D

No offense or trolling intended though, i promise :)

Cool :D ;)

I really try to not write posts looking like ""absolute" declarations along the lines of "this is the (only) right way (because i say so)"" - rather want to share my experience, and if something just didn't work for me - then how i should describe that? ;)


 

mhelin

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
538
Location
Tampere, Finland
If you want to try to use silicon diode drop for biasing the better device are the BA159 and UF4007 diodes (also Cree silicon-carbide was mentioned), they are the quietest according to a diyaudioprojects.com member who tested different diodes for U47 kind of mic amp - diodes (two BA159 in series for 1.1V AFAIK) were also 1.5 dB quieter than resistor for the same job. With diodes you could switch the bias colder or hotter, like using the SiC for the lowest (0.8V), UF4007 for 1.0V, BA157 for 1.3V and red LED for the coldest bias. Small resistor in series for further adjustments. 
 

bockaudio

Well-known member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
244
Location
Los Angeles, CA
FWIW the cathode bypass cap corner frequency is below 10Hz so that's not the primary reason for a sonic difference with fixed bias (not that you can't hear the different VLF differences).
Years ago I instigated current sources for tube cathodes and in tube mics, found that the power supply makes a more significant difference. I don't know that you will really be hot rodding your M49 with a cathode diode.
 

Latest posts

Top