JohnRoberts said:It's not about what I believe, it's about what the DOJ can prove.
I won't even bother to discuss the subjectivity of Bill Barr's choice of investigative topics.
You seem to be wrapped up in what minutiae Barr can dig up on the investigators while ignoring all the evidence of Trump administration wrongdoing that's staring you in the face. There's waste, corruption, fraud and deceit staring you in the face--so much that it's impossible to look into it all--and you and Barr are obsessed with this conspiracy theory that "they" were "out to get" Trump.
The Senate laid it out there: the Trump team was actively engaged with the Russians during the '16 election. There's plenty of evidence of it, and that's even with the administration's stonewalling and outright lying.
The FBI knew enough about it to be rightly and gravely concerned. You and Barr seem happy to ignore any and all malfeasance by Trump while going after the investigators with a shocking vigor and intensity.
So.......
Do you believe that the Trump campaign engaging with the Russians on election interference was unacceptable, but that the bad actors should all get off because of some legal technicailities? In that case, wouldn't it make sense to support neither the FBI nor the Trump administration, since neither is innocent of wrongdoing?
Do you believe that Trump's dalliance with the Russians was perfectly fine, and that all nations should be allowed to collude with presidential campaigns?
Do you believe that, in spite of all evidence to the contrary, Trump's campaign was perfectly innocent in this matter?
I ask because I'm not at all clear what you actually believe here. Are you at the point where you're going to defend your side, no matter how inconsistent or unempirical that defense may be? Or are there some core beliefs there that are not being fully stated?