Well, I don’t spend as much time as I used to with the mastering guys but I can’t recall the last time I heard of an album that was mastered to vinyl with the original master tapes. It’s common to put the album together via computer and then run off a lacquer master.Oh dear.... the digital?
JR
One of the windmills I tilted at regularly with my old "audio mythology" magazine column was that digital audio was somehow fundamentally flawed. CDs were widely dismissed, and the phools came up with some remarkable claims, back in the 80s.Well, I don’t spend as much time as I used to with the mastering guys but I can’t recall the last time I heard of an album that was mastered to vinyl with the original master tapes. It’s common to put the album together via computer and then run off a lacquer master.
No doubt. But in this day and age, I have yet to hear vinyl was made from the master tapes. Doesn’t seem to happen often if at all any more.There is a difference playing straight from the tapes rather than a digital transfer, (based on my gear). My ATR Ampex has a unique better sounding transient response compared to protools when mixing from the live tracked MM1200 and not from my protools rig.
Do master tapes even exist these days? It seems that digital recording could be released directly to the clouds?No doubt. But in this day and age, I have yet to hear vinyl was made from the master tapes. Doesn’t seem to happen often if at all any more.
That’s right. A big Mofi selling point is that they are cut from the original master tapes. They are not. Whether it sounds better or worse is beside the point.===
This lawsuit sounds like simple misrepresenting the product.
Ohhh right, yeah, they screwed up.They used DSD as the digital master format. They are arguing it's better than analog. They are incapable of doing them all analog so it's not credible.
The true Gold discsAs someone who spent 15 years and a small fortune building a console for tape to lacquer mastering
Is it?They used DSD as the digital master format. They are arguing it's better than analog. They are incapable of doing them all analog so it's not credible.
I spent four days cutting from DSD a few weeks ago. I’ve cut from DSD is the past too. DSD definitely has a sound. No less so than PCM. It has kind of a relaxed top end. More closely mimics tape which is probably why it was used.Is it?
My adventures with dsd were back in the sacd era. My recollection was that the dsd Sadie computer with Ed mitner converters sounded like the 1/2” master tape or 1/4” master tape we were feeding the machine. Can’t say it was better but there wasn’t that noticeable difference you have with pcm converters of that era.
At any rate I get the gist of the lawsuit, misrepresenting things.
And that’s why your a mastering guy, to me it was the same sonicI spent four days cutting from DSD a few weeks ago. I’ve cut from DSD is the past too. DSD definitely has a sound. No less so than PCM. It has kind of a relaxed top end. More closely mimics tape which is probably why it was used.
When someone asks me for an all analog cut from tape that’s what they get. I don’t second guess the reasoning. That’s what they want, that’s what they get.
I cut the latest Lemon Twigs directly from tape. Sounds good if I do say so myself.No doubt. But in this day and age, I have yet to hear vinyl was made from the master tapes. Doesn’t seem to happen often if at all any more.
Enter your email address to join: