dmp said:
Aren't AR15s exactly the same except they are missing the auto sear? From what I know the bolt,etc are all full auto compatible and the one little dodad to make it full auto is illegal to make since the '80s. Put that in and it's a M16. You can still buy them (licensed and regulated) but they are stupid expensive.
I suspect back in the 70s(?) when the AR15 first came out they were the same exact weapon with the full automatic defeated. I see little reason to continue doing that now but maybe that makes them more valuable to the posers. The semi-auto capability relies upon the same gas recovery mechanics, so I expect the guts to be pretty similar.
My new air rifle is single load with pellets, but has a magazine for BBs that could improve my fire rate. I think the pellets might be more effective at knocking down my rats with bushy tails (while BBs claim higher muzzle velocity). I will start with BBs for my target practice. I have already printed out a life sized picture of a squirrel. I can't even shoot pellets/BBs carelessly.
========
The primary reason to buy an AR-15 (IMO) is because it "looks" like a M-16... The M-16 wasn't that good of a weapon. When I was in the army people who used both preferred the older M-14 as a superior weapon, but the M-16 was lighter which was a modest benefit during the 10 mile march out the rifle range. (I experienced feed jams at the rifle range which did not inspire confidence in the M-16)
There are so many cheap AR15s around though, there are probably some crappy ones. But a semi-auto tactical rifle with a 30 round clip is definitely not what I'd call a toy.
The original M-16 clip held something like 18 rounds. Popular practice was to tape two clips together back to back so you could turn them around quickly. Full automatic fire rate with only 18 shots is not all that clever in an actual firefight.
What is the intended market for an AR-15? I know why they make them, (because people buy them). I just can't relate to why. (but I don't play first person shooter video games).
Using 3D printing is going to change the ballgame, when it is already such a mess.
yup..
That's true of everything. Think about 9/11 and re-read your paragraph.
9/11 was an act of war, while not from a sovereign nation. Sad thing is it was their second attempt to blow up the trade center. Discounting that failed truck bomb warning cost over 3,000 innocent lives.
If the shooter had been mexican / an immigrant we all know the Republican / trump response would have been different.
I let you guys argue hypothetical team politics talking points.
Trump can be criticized already for things he actually said. No need to make up imaginary stuff and smear all republicans at the same time.
One or two republicans must be OK (I hope, but my judgement must be flawed by definition). ;D
JR
PS: The only claimed benefit I could find for squirrels is burying nuts (and fungus) and forgetting where they put them... They didn't bury any of my pecans that they chewed holes in and ruined.