4. I have isolated the rails with electrical tape, and I used m1.6 Screws to attach the PCB's without touching anything.
Why would you NOT want the ground pads of the PCB connected to the mic chassis?
4. I have isolated the rails with electrical tape, and I used m1.6 Screws to attach the PCB's without touching anything.
Why would you NOT want the ground pads of the PCB connected to the mic chassis?
The holes of the rails to attach the PCB don't align with the PCB
Hi Ruben,Hi @mihi_fuchs
Sorry for the late reply, it has been crazy weeks...but I am finally back to answering properly your very kind reply
I'm a bit confused about how to do it. Will I use the studio monitors to produce the sine wave generator? If so, do I have to open the mic every time to adjust the trimmer and do the test again?
I have confirmed that the PAD and transformer wiring are where they should be. We both used a 3u Audio transformer, too, so I just followed the pictures.
The capsule it's new and right off the box. Since it's backplate independent, I have attached 2 black wiring accordingly to the building guide.
I don't know how to answer you. Can you be specific about where and what should I look for? I'm still a bit fresh on this new world...Sorry!
INFO | QUESTIONS
1. The mic body it's conical and not cylinder, I can feel a bit of no being centered with the bottom screw, can that be a problem? Perhaps if the tall WIMA components touch it? ;
2. Since I didn't know how to calibrate properly, I adjusted to 60v and 10.5v on RV24 and RV10, respectively.
3. Via BOM, it comes 2x as Turrets, which I don't know why. On my first U87 build, I had a turret on J3 [front capsule wiring] like the @Wordsushi had done it, which helped a lot with the hissing noise. Should I keep it or not?
4. I have isolated the rails with electrical tape, and I used m1.6 Screws to attach the PCB's without touching anything.
---
Here are the build pics, Sound spectrum via EQ and the sound recording I made in my last test.
20Nov24 Sound Test | AUDIO SAMPLE [Dropbox]
View attachment 140328
View attachment 140321View attachment 140322
View attachment 140323View attachment 140324
View attachment 140325
---
As always I appreciate feedback, time, and your patience.
Best Regards,
RB
Hi Ruben,
hope everything is fine?
Sorry to hear you still have issues. Components touching the rails may be a very good explanation. However, one thing caught my eye, when looking at the pics:
If I get your wiring right, you used the "Messeingang" for grounding your basket? If that's right, you have used the wrong pad. So if you have another ground connection from the head basket to GND, you maybe simply short R4. Maybe just solder the wire in the pic below to the square pad?
Best regards,
Michael
View attachment 140357
P.S.: I just double checked - the numbering on the PCB regarding the Messeingang is wrong. 1 is the square pad, 2 the round pad. My apologies. Was not your mistake but my wrong numbering. Apologies for that.
Not surprising it gets worse if the headbasket is grounded to the PCB ground. The grille is part of the Faraday cage, protecting it against hum and RFI interference and should be a closed, uninterrupted metal construction. Assuming the grille has insufficient contact to the body, i.e. non-circumferential or a high impedance contact, the wire connected to the PCB ground sends RF signals picked by the grille through the circuit, causing RF interference. The grille mesh should circumferentially contact the mic body and not be connected to anything else.Anyway, I grounded the rails and the head basket with a direct wire and to the PCB ground as recommended on the other hole, and it got worse
Not surprising it gets worse if the headbasket is grounded to the PCB ground. The grille is part of the Faraday cage, protecting it against hum and RFI interference and should be a closed, uninterrupted metal construction. Assuming the grille has insufficient contact to the body, i.e. non-circumferential or a high impedance contact, the wire connected to the PCB ground sends RF signals picked by the grille through the circuit, causing RF interference. The grille mesh should circumferentially contact the mic body and not be connected to anything else.
The best way to resolve RF interference is to: a) ensure the whole mic is a perfect Farady cage and b) have an RF Common Mode filter at the XLR input as I posted before, or use the Neutrik NC3FXX-EMC on your mic cable, preferably paired with an XLR cable with proper RF shielding.
Jan
1. So, should we keep the ground connection from the rails to the grill and get ground from XLR directly into the PCB? Because it's a hole in the PCB for it...That's why I'm confused...
Why would you NOT want the ground pads of the PCB connected to the mic chassis?
Are those side-rails cast, or sheet metal? If they're sheet, bend them so the holes line up with the PCB's.
You're welcome!Hi Jan,
Thanks for responding and well explaining! Understood!
Understand your confusion. It can be quite challenging to get RF interference suppression and proper grounding right. Even "experts" often disagree about the best approach. In this 13-page thread, it was finally fixed using that RFI filter from my previous post in this thread. That filter has a ferrite bead in the ground between XLR pin 1 and the circuit ground. With that filter, the circuit ground should not be tied to the chassis ground as it would bypass the bead.1. So, should we keep the ground connection from the rails to the grill and get ground from XLR directly into the PCB? Because it's a hole in the PCB for it...That's why I'm confused...
See also my post #35 in the thread I linked to above. Those output caps may have worked well against your neighbor's ham radio station in the 1960s and 1970s, but not against current-era Cell Phone RFI. The long wires of through-hole, wired parts, even when mounted directly on the XLR, make these capacitors act more like inductors than capacitors at Cell Phone frequencies. Secondly, they may increase THD and IM significantly, especially with KM84/U87 style circuits running at low bias currents. I'd propose to remove them, or use something like 1nF C0G caps with the shortest leads possible. Another suggestion is to insert a 470R resistor between Drain and output capacitor. It is not as effective as an RFI filter on the XLR insert, but it worked noticeably against RFI in the KM84 designs that I made, without adding noticeable noise due to the transformer attenuation.2. When you say RF common mode filters you mean the RF caps on the XLR PIN2 and PIN3 into the PIN1? I used neutrik but mostly I'm using sommer cable Galileo which is double shielding, which helps a ton.
And what was the outcome? Did you measure now every part of the body agains GND in the closed state of the mic? They should be all close to 0 ohm. Could you report back?Here goes the new wiring:
You're welcome!
Understand your confusion. It can be quite challenging to get RF interference suppression and proper grounding right. Even "experts" often disagree about the best approach. In this 13-page thread, it was finally fixed using that RFI filter from my previous post in this thread. That filter has a ferrite bead in the ground between XLR pin 1 and the circuit ground. With that filter, the circuit ground should not be tied to the chassis ground as it would bypass the bead.
See also my post #35 in the thread I linked to above. Those output caps may have worked well against your neighbor's ham radio station in the 1960s and 1970s, but not against current-era Cell Phone RFI. The long wires of through-hole, wired parts, even when mounted directly on the XLR, make these capacitors act more like inductors than capacitors at Cell Phone frequencies. Secondly, they may increase THD and IM significantly, especially with KM84/U87 style circuits running at low bias currents. I'd propose to remove them, or use something like 1nF C0G caps with the shortest leads possible. Another suggestion is to insert a 470R resistor between Drain and output capacitor. It is not as effective as an RFI filter on the XLR insert, but it worked noticeably against RFI in the KM84 designs that I made, without adding noticeable noise due to the transformer attenuation.
I can imagine the double shielding Galileo cable you mentioned helps a lot. from picking up RF noise. But it's effectiveness can be greatly improved with a non-standard Neutrik EMC plug (type NC3FXX-EMC). Expensive plugs, so you don't want to equip your whole studio with it if not needed. But you could try one and if the RFI issue is gone, it's obvious it enters through the XLR. If not, the next step is to look for "RF leaks" in the mic body and grille.
Jan
Hello Sir @mihi_fuchsAnd what was the outcome? Did you measure now every part of the body agains GND in the closed state of the mic? They should be all close to 0 ohm. Could you report back?
If it is a shielding problem, I suppose you should get more problem if you make a phone call and put your phone next to the mic. Try that.
However, as you describe that you have to crank the gain of the preamp very much, I suppose it could be also the problem that you lose level somewhere inside the circuit or before. Do the supply voltages read 60V?
If you go back to the BM800 body you can omit all the extra grounding wiring.
The rf bead is a nice feature, but you have already RF filtering caps. And in all other builds there has been chassis to ground connection directly without any components in between (a lot of mics, commercial ones too) do that.
Can you post pictures of the body. And measure if the body itself (metal tube around the mic) makes connection to ground by 0 ohm.
Make sure the rail does not touch anything (you could lose level by that ... )
Try these things and in case you are not getting to the happy end, report the observations - then we can try to help further ...
Best regards,
Michael
Are those side-rails cast, or sheet metal? If they're sheet, bend them so the holes line up with the PCB's.
Hello Sir, My apologies.Would you mind reading all my questions and answering them already???????
It's side rails cast
Enter your email address to join: