barclaycon
Well-known member
Bandler and Grinder borrow a lot from others (notably Erickson and Fritz Perls) and seem to have a special liking for TLA:
Three Letter Acronyms.
Whereby giving something a fancy title e.g. Neuro Linguistic Programming or NLP will make it more profound.
As a student of psychology and hypnotherapy myself, I've come across a lot of modern thinking that seems to be a re-hash of what has gone before and which was probably regarded at the time as 'esoteric' thought. That's not to belittle modern stuff like NLP, TLT, CBT, but it's important to ascertain what is being conveyed without getting too bogged down in the detail.
Audio is a perfect example in so much as we revere a lot of the old stuff because it sounds great. We don't have to prove it sounds great with lots of graphs and figures, we can just listen to it. I'm sure they didn't have sophisticated test equipment and computer modeling when a lot of this great stuff was designed.
Knocking up a prototype and fiddling with it can be every bit as useful as a page of maths; perhaps more so.
Three Letter Acronyms.
Whereby giving something a fancy title e.g. Neuro Linguistic Programming or NLP will make it more profound.
As a student of psychology and hypnotherapy myself, I've come across a lot of modern thinking that seems to be a re-hash of what has gone before and which was probably regarded at the time as 'esoteric' thought. That's not to belittle modern stuff like NLP, TLT, CBT, but it's important to ascertain what is being conveyed without getting too bogged down in the detail.
Audio is a perfect example in so much as we revere a lot of the old stuff because it sounds great. We don't have to prove it sounds great with lots of graphs and figures, we can just listen to it. I'm sure they didn't have sophisticated test equipment and computer modeling when a lot of this great stuff was designed.
Knocking up a prototype and fiddling with it can be every bit as useful as a page of maths; perhaps more so.