That was not directed at you. It was not you who mentioned trial.
We’ve been through that extensively already. Short answer is no. I’m not interested in another round though.
And us voters eat it up. And us voters make them! And the politicians do it. And the voters eat it up. And. And. And… And that’s the political life-cycle, kids!
Hard to follow your writing style.
Then you can't really complain about him or his policies.
Just because you cannot discern the actual dangerous types through the hash of spin does not mean others cannot. But keep equivocating.
I seriously have no idea how that was hard to follow. This reminds me of telling one of my kids to do something (the one that didn’t listen the first or third time) and the one that did (the first time I told them), yelling to me that they already did; even though we both know I wasn’t talking to them… Just to give me a hard time. Then we chuckle.
I don’t. I just thought it was obvious in this particular case. I was wrong apparently. My apologies for not being clearer.Don't assume everybody understands your posts...
I am pretty sure that lots of people don't understand what I write (or are ignoring me).
JR
Me too. Takes a lot to throw off my clock.
But..but...that's not what Zero Hedge says! QED libtard!
Yet the vast majority of "masks" worn by people during the pandemic were crappy cloth or disposable surgical masks, neither of which are effective. But great job with the cherry picking fallacy.
I'll also add anecdotal information here. My wife is a nurse and she was wearing N95 and face-shield in her workplace along with all other staff. Yet twice she caught Covid (both during outbreaks in her facility) and passed it on to me at home. We survived. Other staff also caught it and were out of work. It is no surprise that there's been no real study, but only garbage like this. "Evidence suggests" is not science. Very few people wore N95 masks outside of medical facilities anyway.
Yet they do nothing when pathogens are 300nm and highly contagious. Anyone who has coughed or sneezed while wearing a mask knows what happens. Blocking "a percentage" is pointless.
Where are they?
Anyone with a passing knowledge of logic knows that it only takes one counterexample to disprove a theorem/statement. All of the supporting examples mean nothing compared to a single counterexample. So, yes, your examples are BS.
Always. My body, my choice. If you're afraid then stay home, wear a mask, hide in your basement, wipe down your house with solvents, etc. You don't get to dictate to others.
Yet you provided no (peer reviewed) data to back that assertion.
The piece starts off with false info regarding the start date of mask mandates. It wasn't in June of 2020, but mid-April. Why would they want to exclude all of the data? And the plot of Deaths vs Masks is laughable. It's a big scatter splat with no trend whatsoever. No wonder they didn't include the regression score for the stupid linear "fit" so helpfully included.
Believe our amazing immune systems and herd immunity was responsible for the most reductions in death. Pretty sure this is how it worked with every other flu cycle prior to C19.
