zamproject
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 11, 2010
- Messages
- 1,600
zamproject said:hello
Just another example...
Best
Zam
JohnRoberts said:I prefer setting the mics up properly (or using less mics). :
JR
Now here's another thing - the ASCII character set dates to the 1960s when it was defined as a 7-bit character set, so there was nothing (standard) over 127. Many terminal makers enabled 8-bit "characters" (with 8-bit serial transfer - only 7 bits was needed for the original ASCII character set), and they each had a different set of "special" characters for 128 through 255.moamps said:It isn't phi, it is Ø, (a circle crossed by a diagonal slash). ASCII code 157.
So, what's wrong with using Ø for polarity flip function?
clintrubber said:One could argue that if one fails to understand the difference between phase & polarity then it'd be best if said user refrains from operating the BUD 8) OK?
In old German Broadcast this is "Seitentausch" (left / right channel swap) ;DHarpo said:On my last built mixing console (decades ago) I used symbols similar to attached scribble ...
http://www.hausverwaltung-heger.de/al_leck_trick/Polarity-Symbol.pdf
ruffrecords said:So all those guys who designed phase splitters for tube power amp over many decades have been ............
Cheers
Ian
I am not the tube guy here but I think a "phase splitter" is a very specific circuit that generates equal and opposite versions of a waveform, used in an early stage of an amplifier. But I repeat I am not the tube guy here..clintrubber said:Hi,
That's an interesting point, yes, what is 'splitting phase' actually? (Not to be confused with splitting hairs)
'Splitting polarity' doesn't make much more sense to me either, I guess my confusion lies in the splitting part of it.
'Swapped(/Flipped/Inverted) Polarity Addition Stage' seems more technically correct, but I figure the world will stick to Phase Splitter 8) .
Bye
JohnRoberts said:I am not the tube guy here but I think a "phase splitter" is a very specific circuit that generates equal and opposite versions of a waveform, used in an early stage of an amplifier. But I repeat I am not the tube guy here..
Probably possible to do it with a transistor or JFET too but not sure why.
JR
Yes, independantly of the actual technology, the term phase-splitter has been sanctified by decades of usage.clintrubber said:Yes, that's indeed what it does, and is indep. from the active device .... tube, bjt, fet.... and possibly the passive way of doing it with a transformer qualifies for the label ' phase splitter' as well. Was just contemplating the name 'phase splitter', especially the splitter part of it.
abbey road d enfer said:Yes, independantly of the actual technology, the term phase-splitter has been sanctified by decades of usage.
One could consider a phase-splitter as a particular case of phase rotator. In power systems, there are transformer-based phase rotators that take a 3-phase feed and transform it in single-phase or balanced feed. A transformer-based phase-splitter could be considered a particular case of this family of phase rotators, which indeed ends up being simpler.
Enter your email address to join: