Winston OBoogie
Well-known member
...
Last edited:
A coonass AI?Actually, I believe zv-taisv' is not a real member; it's a bot that assembles incoherently audio-related words, and when faced with contradiction resorts to Z-rated action movie dialog.
OK, I missed thatHe didn't say it. In post no. 13 it's Mik that said that.
It sounds a little too specific to be a bot, but AI is slowly getting better. Cursing at a forum moderator sadly sounds all too human (and wrong).A coonass AI?
Indeed not clever to spit into the wind, or tug on superman's cape.Well I won't bother to report this to a moderator because thatbitchis the moderator. Bye.
I agree ! Just couldn't resist after a day on the bench in front of a 'scope. Cheers."Electrons are just wind there is no electrons."
Blimey, I didn't know that. I'll let the IET know and bring it up at my next engineering meeting.
I guess it explains why:
"one time I went to the university and they couldn't fix an electron microscope"
Alternatively he may have been in the History faculty ?
I would change the 114 ohm resistor to the more readily obtained 120 ohms. This will give you 19.5dB of attenuation. Is that how much you need?Thanks for all the "constructive" replies !
So for a balanced connection it should look like this ?
It's not 114 ohms, it's 1.1k., for about 6dB attn.I would change the 114 ohm resistor to the more readily obtained 120 ohms. This will give you 19.5dB of attenuation. Is that how much you need?
Ah, the K looked like a 4 to me and 6dB seems like a more sensible attenuation.It's not 114 ohms, it's 1.1k., for about 6dB attn.
114 ohms is not a standardized value, even in E96, where it falls between 113 and 115.
Enter your email address to join: