1- 100p instead of 180p accross the input transfo.
Is that to extend the top end?? This clone utilize the same input transfo than the ez1290.
Yes, it would increase bandwidth - at the possible expense of increased ringing.
2- 22uf tant instead of 10uf tant in front of the first bc184 of the input and output section.
Is that to extend the low end??
Hmm, I'm not so sure. It could possibly increase stability; this could mean lower THD at expense of bandwidth. Or perhaps it was done to be more resistive to DC offset. I would be interested to hear SCA's reasoning for this, or perhaps ask Geoff T.
3- They suggest to put a loading resistor (620R) on the output. If im going directly into my soundcard that have a 24k input impedence when balanced, should i care about putting a loading resistor??
I'm asking this because i've just notice that inside my api 3124, there's a place to put an ''optional 1k loading resistor''!!
As always, Geoff Tanner's info is GOLDEN (thanks Desol for posting):
>Hi Geoff,
>
>I have got a Neve 32074 with the BA283 and LO1166.
>Should LO1166 always be terminated with 600ohm?
No, not "always"... if your set up is relatively small and you don't have long cable runs on the output, you won't need termination on the output.
The terminations come into play when the cable on the output presents a sufficiently high capacitive content to the load of the transformer that will resonate with the leakage inductance in the transformer to produce a high frequency peak and would be seen as ringing on a square wave or sibilance on a voice or music signal.
Then a 600 ohm load would damp that effect though you might experiment with a scope and a square wave to find the optimum load... which might be higher, like two or three Kohms.
-----------
That said, I'm not sure "improving" these preamps is at all necessary, but that's a personal choice and a bit of experimenting is always good.
Zach, did you get that trimmer worked out?
M.