justinheronmusic
Well-known member
Spencerleehorton said:Just wondered where you got the info for the txf being 1.18:1 ratio?
I was told 4:1 or 5:1 ratio for CF mic?
I have a lot of respect for you and the work you've done, I just want to say that first and foremost; if you hadn't have built a few of these, I would not have had the confidence to challenge myself at doing my own builds. In my search to find the part number for the original transformer I came across the transformer data sheet, as well as a GDIY thread about transformer issues with the mic. In the thread the thread starter sought out guidance from AMI using the data sheet that he got from AKG. Thinking that it could have been misread, I sought out a second opinion from Cinemag, as well as a request for service. I posted the transformer data sheet earlier on in the thread, but I will attach it again for convenience. Below is the e-mail I got from David of Cinemag and the link to the GDIY thread.
NOTE: 1.18:1 is an error, actual turns ratio is 1.84:1
https://groupdiy.com/index.php?topic=63158.0
Hi Justin;
Thank you for your inquiry and for a good picture of the AKG winding sheet.
The turns ratio is 3.67:1+1. Take a look at the 3rd column which shows how the different coils are hooked up, and next the 4th column which gives the number of turns. The primary is A1+A2 in series, for a total of 900+900=1800 turns. There are 2 secondaries, being A3/A4 and A5/A6. These two secondaries are each hooked up in series with each section having 245 turns. Hence, the number of turns is 245+245=490. 1800/490=3.67. If the two secondary windings are hooked up in series the turns ratio becomes 1800/(490*2)=1.84:1. AMI's information is correct. Being a cathode-follower, this turns ratio makes sense.
The next problem becomes the proper lamination to use. I did not spot that specification on the winding sheet. However, my guess is that they used the same material as the T14/1, which is a metric size that we do not stock. I probably could do it on 124DU laminations, which you can see in the mechanical drawing for the CM-13114. However, it would not be exactly the same as the original even though it would be pretty close.
Kindest regards,
David Geren