jamesson said:Well, thats just my point; let people write their own algorithms. I'm positive I can do better than this; http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/marser/owl-programmable-effects-pedal/posts
An added feature is that we can put in firmware encryption so if people want to sell soft fx for it they can.
Edit: Ruairi, would you mind drawing a block diagram of how you would expect the wet/dry signal to go, or even just link to a schematic you like.
What do you see in Owl that needs to be improved?
jamesson said:What do you see in Owl that needs to be improved?
The UI is useless. We need an LCD screen. Lots of other options possible, including phone jacks for added control pedals, midi, even an sd recorder. Many many options. My original suggestion was, use Faust (http://faust.grame.fr/). Pretty popular, made by IRCAM, and theres already a java port (albeit somewhat half-assed).
jamesson said:Perhaps you are right to dismiss lcd out of hand
Another idea I had, a multitrack looper/recorder. The interface would be a bit challenging but it could do double duty as a live loop player and multitracker.
critterkllr said:I'd say around 98% of the guitar players I know (including myself) want simplicity.
Enter your email address to join: