khstudio
Well-known member
[quote author="rafafredd"]I would use at least 1000uF. It´s for flat frequency response on all gain settings. You could go as high as 4700uF.
Also, 12uF is way too low for the opamps bypass. Electrolytics were much more expensive by the time that they drew that API schem.[/quote]
The 1000uf definitly seemed to increace the lows/subs along with the 220uf/.1 mono on the supply rails.
My original test setup had the 250uf = C3 & 22uf/no cap = PS & still sounded great but a hair looser & less SUBs.
I'm concerned with the voltage of C3 - I'm using a 35v cap right now... is this too much & can it affect the "sound" at all :?:
Also, the feedback cap, I've seen mentioned to use a poly in stead of a ceramic... any opinions or preference on this?
Thanks,
Kevin
Also, 12uF is way too low for the opamps bypass. Electrolytics were much more expensive by the time that they drew that API schem.[/quote]
The 1000uf definitly seemed to increace the lows/subs along with the 220uf/.1 mono on the supply rails.
My original test setup had the 250uf = C3 & 22uf/no cap = PS & still sounded great but a hair looser & less SUBs.
I'm concerned with the voltage of C3 - I'm using a 35v cap right now... is this too much & can it affect the "sound" at all :?:
Also, the feedback cap, I've seen mentioned to use a poly in stead of a ceramic... any opinions or preference on this?
Thanks,
Kevin