ruffrecords
Well-known member
The 'Irish question' has vexed British politicians for centuries. IMHO it is time we gave it back.
Cheers
Ian
Cheers
Ian
cyrano said:Counterfeit car parts?
When did we get to "protect" bullbars as intellectual property?
I don't know if it is protected by intellectual property but for sure it is a big deal with (safety) approval (like with fake spare parts).cyrano said:Counterfeit car parts?
When did we get to "protect" bullbars as intellectual property?
IP is applicable to any design (registered model or trade mark); that's how fashion designers get their creations protected, although they certainly cannot claim patents.cyrano said:When did we get to "protect" bullbars as intellectual property?
[silent:arts] said:I don't know if it is protected by intellectual property but for sure it is a big deal with (safety) approval (like with fake spare parts).
Typical small ball.... keep focus on big picture.DaveP said:With the UK teetering on the brink of catastrophe, the leader of the opposition calls the Prime Minister a stupid woman, we all read his lips.
He is such a little sh*te he could not own it, He would lose all his PC street cred, so he denies he said it and looks like a weasel instead. What is it with them?
Disgusted
DaveP
You could design a bull-bar, register the model, and sue anyone that would copy it with intent to market it. You don't have to prove that it's new, or better. That's how Gibson managed to end up the flood of Les Paul copies in the 70's; the only way they (and their lawiers) found was to sue for infringement on the headstock design.cyrano said:And I really don't see where IP comes along as we are talking about bull-bars,
I believe you know the actual composition of the plastic used for car lights is an element of certification. Some plastics become very sharp in case of breakage and may pose a danger to pedestrians.or safety, when it comes to rear lights.
;Druffrecords said:If shooting yourself in the foot was an Olympic sport then all politicians would be gold medallists.
abbey road d enfer said:You could design a bull-bar, register the model, and sue anyone that would copy it with intent to market it. You don't have to prove that it's new, or better. That's how Gibson managed to end up the flood of Les Paul copies in the 70's; the only way they (and their lawiers) found was to sue for infringement on the headstock design.
I believe you know the actual composition of the plastic used for car lights is an element of certification. Some plastics become very sharp in case of breakage and may pose a danger to pedestrians.
I always thought "mules" were used to carry illegal drugs across national borders, often secreted in their alimentary canal.cyrano said:Owww... KBC
That doesn't surprise me one bit. I recently came upon some criminals looking for mules. You know, where they use your bank account to transfer money from scams. While in the past, the mule could get 10% or even 20% of the money transferred, it went up to 50%. Probably because recently about a dozen of these setups got rolled up by police.
There are always miscreants working angles that provide opportunities to steal.The scammers wanted a KBC account. No other bank would do. I think that's because you can open as many accounts as you 'd like, online, with KBC. And the ATM card the mule gave them, allows to start a number of online banking accounts, all linked to that one card. So the mule gets nothing, cause he gave the card to the criminals. He can't even access these accounts.
No other bank allows that.
Enter your email address to join: