I think most of the guys at dbx at the time were musicians. I remember, my first encounter there was with Joe Lemanski, he had a Les Paul in his office...Did you know Les is a talented pianist, and Gary is a kickass drummer?
I think most of the guys at dbx at the time were musicians. I remember, my first encounter there was with Joe Lemanski, he had a Les Paul in his office...Did you know Les is a talented pianist, and Gary is a kickass drummer?
FWIW THAT's building in Milford was at one time a jazz speakeasy in addition to being an electric motor manufacturing facility. Throughout the building are pictures of the jazz greats that played there. The basement break room is a performance/rehearsal area - when I was there Gary had his drums setup.I think most of the guys at dbx at the time were musicians. I remember, my first encounter there was with Joe Lemanski, he had a Les Paul in his office...
This was at a time where all live SE's were expecting and relied upon a flat system.It had the hardware, and the smarts, to keep track of two signals simultaneously. So you could feed your music to one input of the RTA-1 (and to the PA system), and "listen" to the room with a mic connected to another RTA-1 input. As your intro music played, the analyzer would compare the two signals, note the difference in the responses, and display that difference -- i.e. it would show the room response curve.
This means the sound engineer could not only get a room curve without blasting everybody with pink noise, but could also run the process repeatedly even as the audience filled the venue, so the effect of the audience itself could be corrected for.
They certainly did, but not in the ridiculous amounts we see today.oh, 35y ago the smarter system and house engineers knew to boost the bass, I believe I recall.
Hi David!Coming in very late, I am so glad to see the designer weigh in here. He is a fine smart engineer and a helpful colleague with whom I happily worked in dbx engineering for many years. I wrote the first user manual for the dbx RTA1, short and sweet and to the point, and the week I was laid off, as dbx went through endstage conniptions, I got a TW / rec eng friend to write a longer doc, which also became the ST4000 manual (these latter manuals are sometimes available as pdfs online ). I still use my unit to assess loudspeakers, indoors and out- (half-anechoically). DB and I know the ace tech who is a font for everything else about the product, and I keep up with our other db-exers.
It is a marvelous device, and was used for many years by designers of EAW, BA, Allison, and other speaker lines. Roy Allison in fact said even as a technology dinosaur it was so handy and so much faster and more reliable for driver and crossover iteration than anything in the world of impulse-based tech. (Now smartphone RTA apps can come close but are clumsier to use post-measurements.) Partly due to my advocacy (whingeing) over the decades every smartphone RTA now has temporal averaging, an essential feature uniquely implemented by DB in the dbx unit, setting it above everything from Ivie and AudioControl and the rest.
Online a pro sound user wrote it was the only RTA gear he knew that accurately and reliably corresponded to what he heard in the house. Other dbx engineers wrote a graphing program (has to run under dosbox) which is extremely handy for saving and displaying curves, and which now has updates (not fully finished) for modern Windows PCs. I can provide these programs to anyone interested, but limited support. More to come in case there are questions.
I wonder if this site will let an exe be postedHi David!
I'd definitely be interested in those programs you mentioned! I have the Sound Technology version of the RTA-1.
Thanks!
awesome, want to hear moreHi David!
I'd definitely be interested in those programs you mentioned! I have the Sound Technology version of the RTA-1.
Thanks!
Enter your email address to join: