I'll also be using it to build 6 500-series lunchboxes whenever CAPI gets their **** in order along with a whole lot of CAPI EQs, comps, and maybe some other stuff if I come across any builds that hold up to the high-end standards of the studio.You didn't say it was "just" for that. It's a nice meter.
I've been thinking about this thread and what I really need from a DMM. Most of the time I'm measuring continuity, or DCV. After that the most common measurement is ohms and diodes. I need to measure audio fairly rarely but when I do it needs to be spot on. This lead me to think that since wide AC bandwidth is the feature that adds the most cost to a DMM I should use two meters. One for ACV measurements and another for everything else. I have a Fluke 8060A which is accurate but missing a couple of buttons and feels a bit fragile at its advanced age. It occurred to me that I should just leave it on ACV and only use it for that. I'm looking at picking up a Fluke 107. It's their most basic meter and just a little over $100. It's small which is nice for crawling behind racks. If the continuity beep is as fast as on other models it has everything I need. A used 860A goes for between $100-$150. For $250-$300 you could have a really nice DMM setup.
I tried the EEV Blog one that a friend had. I’m not sure of the model. The continuity beep had a noticeable delay. The Flukes are really good for that. Continuity is my most used function so I wouldn’t want to compromise on that. It’s nice to be able to rake a probe over a multipin connector to find the connection.I see some people recommending the Brymen BM789, which apparently has 100kHz bandwidth. Not sure how it compares to a fluke though.
Same as you, I have a 8060a since long time and recently decide to use it as single purpose for "safe" audio AC measurement and dB calibration, replaced for all other tasks by a 175One for ACV measurements and another for everything else. I have a Fluke 8060A which is accurate but missing a couple of buttons and feels a bit fragile at its advanced age.
Same here. I checked the 8060A against the Fluke 287 and AP Portable One and it was spot on. I’m thinking of picking up another one to keep in the studio for stereo calibration duties.As side note, I compare basic reading of the 8060a with the new 175 (saying correctly calibrated I guess), and the old 8060 was spot on !!
Who needs 6 1/2 digits?
Elma BM789
Looks good. Does it beep when it goes into Power Safe mode?B&K 388B would be the DMM that I would get if I needed a new one.
I agree with your DMM use case. DCV, small ACV (-10 to +20 dBu audio), Ohms, diode Vf, and continuity are by far the most common use for DMMs in my studio. Also useful when troubleshooting is capacitance measurement capability. Especially handy is a min/max hold function when measuring high tube voltages. The talking feature also sounds nice.I've been thinking about this thread and what I really need from a DMM. Most of the time I'm measuring continuity, or DCV. After that the most common measurement is ohms and diodes. I need to measure audio fairly rarely but when I do it needs to be spot on. This lead me to think that since wide AC bandwidth is the feature that adds the most cost to a DMM I should use two meters. One for ACV measurements and another for everything else. I have a Fluke 8060A which is accurate but missing a couple of buttons and feels a bit fragile at its advanced age. It occurred to me that I should just leave it on ACV and only use it for that. I'm looking at picking up a Fluke 107. It's their most basic meter and just a little over $100. It's small which is nice for crawling behind racks. If the continuity beep is as fast as on other models it has everything I need. A used 860A goes for between $100-$150. For $250-$300 you could have a really nice DMM setup.
Enter your email address to join: