jdbakker
Well-known member
Hi all,
As the title says: does anyone really use vari-speed?
Context: I am working on a DIY PLL to sync (DIY) AD/DAs to incoming word clock, and I am trying to judge how many people really need to be able to support a continuously variable sample rate. It would be much easier to just focus on getting the best performance out of a fixed-frequency PLL for 44k1/48k/88k2/96k/176k4/192k sampling, both for me as a designer and for anyone who would want to build it.
I have never felt the urge to use Vari-Speed. I know that older ADAT tape drives would Vari-Speed to deal with the fact that tape can't instantaneously get from zero to full speed, and there are CD drives out there with speed controls which also affect their digital output sample rate. To me such situations, if they do occur, call for an ASRC to get the variable rate locked to studio sync, and studio sync should be as rock solid as possible.
Yet many commercial converters and master clocks still support it. Is this in response to actual user demand, or just one of those pesky legacy requirements that are so hard to get rid of?
Thanks,
JDB.
As the title says: does anyone really use vari-speed?
Context: I am working on a DIY PLL to sync (DIY) AD/DAs to incoming word clock, and I am trying to judge how many people really need to be able to support a continuously variable sample rate. It would be much easier to just focus on getting the best performance out of a fixed-frequency PLL for 44k1/48k/88k2/96k/176k4/192k sampling, both for me as a designer and for anyone who would want to build it.
I have never felt the urge to use Vari-Speed. I know that older ADAT tape drives would Vari-Speed to deal with the fact that tape can't instantaneously get from zero to full speed, and there are CD drives out there with speed controls which also affect their digital output sample rate. To me such situations, if they do occur, call for an ASRC to get the variable rate locked to studio sync, and studio sync should be as rock solid as possible.
Yet many commercial converters and master clocks still support it. Is this in response to actual user demand, or just one of those pesky legacy requirements that are so hard to get rid of?
Thanks,
JDB.