"Can" in extreme cases but rarely would. In the vast majority of cases a film cap will make an improvement in every aspect but BOM cost.I beg to differ, in that cpas with different charcteristcs can alter the crossover behavior.
JR
"Can" in extreme cases but rarely would. In the vast majority of cases a film cap will make an improvement in every aspect but BOM cost.I beg to differ, in that cpas with different charcteristcs can alter the crossover behavior.
Interesting amp. The output MOSFETS have gain, which is quite uncommon. The drivers for these also have gain. The linearity of MOSFETs is not an easy question, most FETs are designed for switching. Here mfg. specifies IR parts, now Vishay. Datasheet is a bit light on the transfer curve, the part from ST looks promising, after a few ampere idle current .BM15A and BM15 are totally different animals what comes to crossovers. The passive has 6db/oct filters whereas the active comes with
"1.7 kHz electronic crossover, 5th order phase aligned.
Instrumentation type balanced input section, with input
overload protection." as the user manual puts it.
You can dl service manual from
BM15A service manual
Instead of just swapping components of the passive crossover you might want to build the active crossover with or without the amps in BM15A. They give much steeper slope thus much narrower area in the output of the two drivers where the frequencies are overlapping and causing phase problems and hot spotting, meaning the FR changes when you move away from the sweet spot. So with steeper filters the sweet spot is wider. Also having overload protection is useful. Using DSP (MiniDSP and like) though makes things easier to control and adjust, even for some room eq.
Enter your email address to join: