Four KM-84 Clones - Blind Test

[k brown]

the cm4 is an insane buy, almost as good as schoeps (or better than many of their offerings honestly, but not all) for way way less money. it has a few caveats, like that it can't be used in small booths because its vents are sensitive to reflections at 90 degrees, but for performance and field recording? difficult to find a better mic at any price

Weelll . . . that overstates things a tad.

The flatness of the frequency response is their most remarkabe feature; that and the unbeatable value. But they do not have the low self noise and resolution of a Schoeps, or indeed most other mics in that league.

For recording Classical music, they make terrific spot mics; there the flat response is perfect, and the self noise is never an issue.

 

[joulupukki]

My son ordered a pair through the Benelux distributor. If all goes well, we'll have them before X-mas. He used to have a pair of CM2s, but he sold them off, because he found the them sounding utterly boaring...

Jan

I’m on the list to get a pair from this same dealer but probably won’t see them ‘til late in the year or early next year. Will be interesting to put them to work!

 

[IBarfoot]

I must admit I have a number of the previous Line Audio CM3 wide cardioids, they are superb, amazing value for money and never dissapoint.
I used to purchase them direct but sadly Brexit has done for that, being in the UK. I should realy look at buying some of the CM4 by the sound of the comments here.

 

[k brown]

I must admit I have a number of the previous Line Audio CM3 wide cardioids, they are superb, amazing value for money and never dissapoint.
I used to purchase them direct but sadly Brexit has done for that, being in the UK. I should realy look at buying some of the CM4 by the sound of the comments here.

I've never heard that the CM4 sounds any better than CM3. The polar pattern is very slightly different; they only came out with the CM4 because the capsule used in the CM3 became unavailable.

 

[Dylan W]

Ok, here's a bonus blind test! Sorry, no video this time and you'll have to pull down the wav files yourself to listen.

In no particular order, the mics in this test are:

• Microphone Parts SDC-84
• @jp8 KM84+
• @jp8 KM84++
• Takstar CM-60
• Takstar CM-63
• My Graeme Woller KM84 build in a Takstar CM-60 body

I no longer have the KM-184 since I had to return it or I would have included it.

This collection of WAV files contain static mixes from each mic. The instruments in this track are acoustic guitar, mandolin, banjo, and upright bass. No fancy playing, just quick and dirty to get something. The only thing I've done is a little panning and some crude volume balance and automation. Oh, and I did add a tiny bit of room/reverb to all instruments except for the upright bass just so it didn't feel completely dry.

The purpose of this test was for me to see how these microphones sound if I were to stack them in a mix from every instrument. I can hear differences between the mics. It's interesting hearing good / bad qualities based on listening to a particular instrument/mic combo. I wouldn't ever record this way for a real album. Two of these mics I definitely wouldn't use.

I recorded the mics in pairs of two so there are three "performances". Mics 1 and 2 were recorded together as were 3 and 4 ... and 5 and 6. Each mic had its own mic stand and clip with about 1 inch of separation. For guitar they were about 6-8 inches away from where the neck meets the body. Mandolin about 12-14" away – same with banjo (with the mics pointing where the neck meets the banjo head). With upright bass the mics were pointed directly in front of the bridge with about 6-8" from the tip of the bridge.

Any guesses as to which ones are which?

No guesses, but here are my thoughts. Listening once technically and once emotionally:

I liked Mic 6 best, felt it put me "closest" to the music

Mics 2, 3, 4, 5 somewhere in the middle.

5 sounded muffled/boomy, but very good midrange resolution, could be second-best with EQ.

2, 3, and 4 hard to tell apart. I preferred either 3 or 4 depending on the listen, 4 the most detailed but also harshest. 2 least favorite by a small margin

Mic 1 least favorite, sounded cheap and muffled


I would go
6
3/5/4
1

 

[joulupukki]

No guesses, but here are my thoughts. Listening once technically and once emotionally:

I liked Mic 6 best, felt it put me "closest" to the music

Mics 2, 3, 4, 5 somewhere in the middle.

5 sounded muffled/boomy, but very good midrange resolution, could be second-best with EQ.

2, 3, and 4 hard to tell apart. I preferred either 3 or 4 depending on the listen, 4 the most detailed but also harshest. 2 least favorite by a small margin

Mic 1 least favorite, sounded cheap and muffled


I would go
6
3/5/4
1

Thanks for listening and for your guesses! I almost forgot to give the answers. They are:

1. Takstar CM-60
2. Takstar CM-63
3. My Graeme Woller KM84 build in a Takstar CM-60 body
4. Microphone Parts SDC-84
5. @jp8 KM84+
6. @jp8 KM84++

In these tests I've been surprised at how the MP SDC-84 has sounded more harsh to me than the others. There's definitely a bump in the high end which surprised me. #3, my Graeme Woller build, is almost identical to that. I feel like the @jp8 mics do a pretty good job at not being harsh on the high end, but ... I'd like to see a little more definition in the KM84++ and so if I had to choose my favorite at this point, I'd go with a KM84+.

 

[k brown]

Worth keeping in mind that per @jp8, the FET bias trimmer in the CM-63 is likely not set right; so for most fair test it should be tested for optimum setting.

 

[joulupukki]

Worth keeping in mind that per @jp8, the FET bias trimmer in the CM-63 is likely not set right; so for most fair test it should be tested for optimum setting.

I’ll have to figure out how to measure and set that on that particular mic. The other major difference on the KM84++ (in the CM-63 body) is that the venting below the capsule is significantly different than the CM-60.