guitar distortion/preamp

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

LazyOne

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 4, 2004
Messages
49
Location
belgium
i recently had an idea.
when you use a guitar amp and overdrive it you will probabbly also get some transformer saturation. especially in a SE design.
the most of it is second order harmonics and thats what sounds really nice whit guitar amps.
also you have the speaker that adds some eq and feedback.
now the ideau is to have a preamp that you can use for a guitar that has a good distortion option and recently i tried something.
i had a simple pre with instrument input and used that for just a clean sound on a track of my console where i could add some eqing for optimising the sound of the guitar. that was a pretty clean sound.
i needed distortion also and i had a mic amp with input transformer and -20db pad. i set the gain almost at minimum (it was with tubes) and rooted the aux to that preamp and push the -20db in.
at that point i could go from clean to some bluesy sound to heavy overdrive but you only had the tubes that go into overdrive.
then i tought i could set the gain at minimum again and out out the -20db pad.
at that point the transformer saturates when you put in a good normal line signal. that depended on my aux output.
it sounded quite nice tough.
after that i routed that output to a second channel of my console and now i could tune the guitar sound before overdriving it and also after overdriving it. after the overdrive the highs must be filtered a little beceause a normal guitar amp does that by the speaker use so with some tweaking the sounds is good i think.
now my question is will the input trannie suffer from this "abuse"
beceause you could make an easely preamp for guitar only
use like 50-60db of gain with a 12ax7. use some sort of passive eq between it.
at the output use a transformer tha you can saturate with some voltage swing and place a -20db pad or maybe a stepped attenuator.
after the trannie use a simple dual triode. also with some passive eq in between and a volume pot.
i think this would work. with the attenuator you can choose if you want to overdrive the trannie. also you dant have that much noise in this way.
it is just something that came in my mind and that i tryed.

so

input amp with passive eq around 50-60db => attenuator => trannie => levelpot=>amp with passive eq around 20db or something

or is this just plain stupid?
 
It sounds like a good DIY project.

I like old tape head/mic amps for distortion, and have lifted one or two of them out of old tape players for tube saturation sounds. Many times the EQ is a cap in the feedback or simply a K cap that can be lifted or replaced.

http://recordist.com/ampex/schematics/200aman/200pb.gif

http://recordist.com/ampex/schematics/350man/350fig02a.gif

Here is a distortion box that I own and have modded for better frequency response. Same kind of premise without a tranny.

http://kanak.perl.it/amptronic/cream-ori.gif

Who was telling me that Stevie Ray Vaughn used to rewind his preamp/amp trannies to saturate? Maybe it's bunk, or perhaps he should have just went out and bought a couple of edcors.
 
Doesn't seem stupid to me... maybe I'm stupid. :roll:

Transformer saturation would give lots of compression which would sound good for some styles also. I've noticed that the Laney output trannies look pretty small. I know they keep costs way low, but I also thought it might be for some compression and transformer distortion. The output of a Laney drops as the transformers warm up apparently.

I say do it and let us know how it goes.

My understanding is that guys like Stevie and Jimmi tried everything in their quest for tone. I read of Jimi handwinding pickups at 2a.m. while in the army.
 
hmmm probably gonna try it out.
in a good week my exams start and i'll have time for it.
probably gonna try with an edcor. they are not so expensive and really not bad.
i'll do some more testing with the settings that i have an indicating to what the eq's should be like.
will be updated.
 
I tried already using a transformer from a vintage radio. Indeed, it sounds like a grown up amp. However, no speaker and speaker cab coloration, though... Later, I tried a tubeless and transformerless approach and got very similar result:

se-pp.gif
 
[quote author="Wavebourn"]I tried already using a transformer from a vintage radio. Indeed, it sounds like a grown up amp. However, no speaker and speaker cab coloration, though... Later, I tried a tubeless and transformerless approach and got very similar result:
<img>
[/quote]

The latter diode pair simulates cross-over distortion in class (A)B PP amps, it should also be bypassed when the switch is in SE position, right?
 
[quote author="King_Cruiser"]Needs phase swapper if used as side chain.[/quote]
Make that a polarity swapper and you're my friend :wink:
 
[quote author="mhelin"][quote author="Wavebourn"]I tried already using a transformer from a vintage radio. Indeed, it sounds like a grown up amp. However, no speaker and speaker cab coloration, though... Later, I tried a tubeless and transformerless approach and got very similar result:
<img>
[/quote]

The latter diode pair simulates cross-over distortion in class (A)B PP amps, it should also be bypassed when the switch is in SE position, right?[/quote]

No. It compensates non-linearities of the first pair of diodes. I used germanium diodes for the last pair.
 
[quote author="Joechris"]Wavebourn, could you add your resistor values to your schematic??
jo[/quote]

Try (left to right) 1K, 1M, 1M, 10K, use some low input current OpAmp, like with FET input.

However, some preamp and 0.1mkF cap is needed for input.
 
IIRC the Boss heavy metal has a stage like that fragment with the Ges to sim the crossover section. I will try to find a link to the schematic.

Found it
http://www.freeinfosociety.com/electronics/schemview.php?id=134
 
[quote author="Gus"]IIRC the Boss heavy metal has a stage like that fragment with the Ges to sim the crossover section. I will try to find a link to the schematic.[/quote]

As I said, it is not to sim crossover distortions, first and second pairs of diodes work opposite, remember they are devices of exponential law, and the first pair is in feedback of opamp with huge OL gain. Theoretically amount of distortions may be zero when both pairs compensate transfer functions of each other.

Roland used the same principle in some their pedal, I don't remember which one.
 
Different types of diodes produce different sounds, not just a common Si & Ge type.
For those interested, experiment with many different types of diodes and also try bipolar transistors connected as diodes.
 
[quote author="Sorr"]Different types of diodes produce different sounds, not just a common Si & Ge type.
For those interested, experiment with many different types of diodes and also try bipolar transistors connected as diodes.[/quote]

Have you done this? can you tell us what you like the sound of?
 
I just put couple of them near my ear, no sound at all... :roll:


Where do they sound different?
 
mikep,
Some years ago I experimented with a similar design and found after going through a whole lot of different PN junctions that I could get variations of the distortion sound.
I dont remember what diodes I preferred, I just mentioned it because I thought some people would like to try it.
 
Oh kids... Variations of resistors make more sense in this schemo than variations of internal resistions of diodes.
 
Back
Top