Happy 4th July

GroupDIY Audio Forum

Help Support GroupDIY Audio Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Happy 4th, words matter.

JR

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
 
Anyone mind some peanut-gallery op ed? Hope not, happy 4th nonetheless!

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
Sounds a lot like gerrymandering / redistricting / social security number checks at voting booths  :-\

Edit:
"He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions."
How long until demands pressure us to modify this language? (How bad this idea?)

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation.
Guantanamo Bay comes to mind...

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
"It is true that the theory of our Constitution is, that all taxes are paid voluntarily; that our government is a mutual insurance company, voluntarily entered into by the people with each other; that each man makes a free and purely voluntary contract with all others who are parties to the Constitution, to pay so much money for so much protection, the same as he does with any other insurance company; and that he is just as free not to be protected, and not to pay tax, as he is to pay a tax, and be protected. But this theory of our government is wholly different from the practical fact. The fact is that the government, like a highwayman, says to a man: “Your money, or your life.” And many, if not most, taxes are paid under the compulsion of that threat. The government does not, indeed, waylay a man in a lonely place, spring upon him from the roadside, and, holding a pistol to his head, proceed to rifle his pockets. But the robbery is none the less a robbery on that account; and it is far more dastardly and shameful." -L.Spooner

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
My hackneyed addendum:  By 'fortunes' we mean the life that labors within possibility, not the value these labors may directly produce. A person's life is their greatest fortune, often squandered, impossible to repay.  Because the fruits of labor draw from the priceless treasure of life, let these fruits sustain this Declaration, or any other aim not in competition with it.

 
boji said:
Anyone mind some peanut-gallery op ed? Hope not, happy 4th nonetheless!
Sounds a lot like gerrymandering / redistricting / social security number checks at voting booths  :-\

Edit: How long until demands pressure us to modify this language? (How bad this idea?)
In case I haven't mentioned this lately, we need to be cognizant of the social mores of the time hundreds of years ago. I doubt many (any?) historical figures would pass modern PC standards of behavior. Some of our founders owned slaves, clearly deplorable by modern standards but their reputations should not be tarnished by centuries later modern thinking. They were a product of their times who still accomplished remarkable things. 
Guantanamo Bay comes to mind...
? Not sure what about gitmo is bothering you in this context but it was a created to finesse our own constitution while holding non-state military combatants to prevent them from returning to the fight. It would have been far simpler and cheaper to just kill them all and let god sort them out, but we don't roll that way.
"It is true that the theory of our Constitution is, that all taxes are paid voluntarily; that our government is a mutual insurance company, voluntarily entered into by the people with each other; that each man makes a free and purely voluntary contract with all others who are parties to the Constitution, to pay so much money for so much protection, the same as he does with any other insurance company; and that he is just as free not to be protected, and not to pay tax, as he is to pay a tax, and be protected. But this theory of our government is wholly different from the practical fact. The fact is that the government, like a highwayman, says to a man: “Your money, or your life.” And many, if not most, taxes are paid under the compulsion of that threat. The government does not, indeed, waylay a man in a lonely place, spring upon him from the roadside, and, holding a pistol to his head, proceed to rifle his pockets. But the robbery is none the less a robbery on that account; and it is far more dastardly and shameful." -L.Spooner
don't know who spooner is, but the popular colonist's refrain was that "taxation without representation is tyranny"... a very popular slogan back in the 1750-1760s.
My hackneyed addendum:  By 'fortunes' we mean the life that labors within possibility, not the value these labors may directly produce. A person's life is their greatest fortune, often squandered, impossible to repay.  Because the fruits of labor draw from the priceless treasure of life, let these fruits sustain this Declaration, or any other aim not in competition with it.
The Declaration was a remarkable document, the constitution even more remarkable, but everything needs to be held in context of the times. The later constitution anticipated needing changes over time and thus incorporated its own feature to add amendments later.

JR
 
everything needs to be held in context of the times.

Yes, of course!

Regarding Gitmo,  the argument for holding people from due process using 'jurisdictions foreign to our constitution' shouldn't be, better to have killed them on the battlefield. :(  I prefer reason and evidence be submitted against these foreign combatants in a manner in keeping with our constitution, such that we, the people know what they did and what justice was carried out. Having them live out their miserable lives rotting in a cell without ever meeting their accuser seems inhumane, imo.

Regarding the line on Indian conscripts, I'm saying given the recent calls for the removal of monuments and artwork,  i'm afraid it is only a matter of time before they come for the words of the constitution.

Also I have a bit of trouble with the idea that we're to interpret some lines in the spirit of the times, while using other lines in the spirit of literalism, especially when it supports polarizing arguments (for example, "a well regulated militia").  I don't think calls for a revision should be unquestionably taboo, as amendments have pretty much stopped occurring as well. Of course that seems like an impossibility in this day and age. How much of the 'living constitution' is made frozen due to the interpretation of lines that benefit particular interests? It's all a legal shell game now, imo.

Apologies if I'm not in keeping with the vibe of the 4th.  I appreciate you posting the 1st issue of the Constitution.
 
boji said:
Yes, of course!

Regarding Gitmo,  the argument for keeping people from due process using 'jurisdictions foreign to our constitution' shouldn't be, better to have killed them on the battlefield.
In what world is not killing them "NOT" better? Certainly more humane, but a huge PIA because of our constitution.
:(  I prefer reason and evidence be submitted against these foreign combatants in a manner in keeping with our constitution, such that we, the people know what they did and what justice was carried out.
A luxury we are not afforded in the heat of battle. International law has not effectively come up with remedy for dealing with non-state actors, making war.  It should not be difficult to find examples of more brutal treatment of battlefield combatants, by less humane governments.

Some actual states (Iran... cough) use non-state proxies, to promulgate their mischief in an attempt to escape responsibility. 
Having them live out their miserable lives rotting in a cell without ever meeting their accuser seems inhumane, imo.
Straw man fallacy. A fraction of gitmo residents are not accepted back by their actual home countries, or others. If anybody it is these, their own home countries, that are leaving them there to rot.

We don't want them, apparently nobody else does either. 
Regarding the line on Indian conscripts, I'm saying given the recent calls for the removal of monuments and artwork,  i'm afraid it is only a matter of time before they come for the words of the constitution.
A review of period history reveals that some Indian nations were used strategically against the American colonists.

The poor treatment of native Americans since even before our founding, with some mistreatment still going on today, is another can of worms, opened by this judgmental revisit of our national history. Again we are not the only nation with history we prefer to leave quiet in the past. While all current bad behavior needs to be stopped/fixed immediately.
Also I have a bit of trouble with the idea that we're to interpret some lines in the spirit of the times, while using other lines in the spirit of literalism, especially when it supports polarizing arguments (for example, "a well regulated militia").  I don't think calls for a revision should be unquestionably taboo, as amendments have pretty much stopped occurring as well. Of course that seems like an impossibility in this day and age. How much of the 'living constitution' is made frozen due to the interpretation of lines that benefit particular interests? It's all a legal shell game now, imo, run by corporate interests.
Sorry that is the hand we are dealt... and why we need smart people in SCOTUS, they have the hard work of interpreting old written law.
Apologies if I'm not in keeping with the vibe of the 4th.  I appreciate you posting the 1st issue of the Constitution.
No IMO it is actually in the spirit of the 4th to celebrate our founding principles, with warts and all of our founders, while we need to be thoughtful, to not #metoo them unfairly.

JR
 
zqiouGC.jpg
 
Back
Top