For the record I did not say that the price movement in silver was a short squeeze (most holders are long), but a similar to Gamestop attempt to manipulate order flows with social media touts. (I repeat look up the Hunt Brothers for their failed attempt to corner the silver market years ago. )john12ax7 said:This is simply not true, despite what several media outlets are reporting. The actual facts are easily verified by simply spending some time reading the reddit thread at the center of things.
The real manipulation is trying to create the illusion of a short squeeze in SLV. Who owns very large long positions there? The very same funds getting crushed by GME.
One theory is that this is a conspiracy to punish bankers that reportedly hold silver, but since they are typically long, I don't see how moving the price up would hurt them. Any short positions in silver are routine futures hedging to protect against commodity market moves. Held by "hedge funds" hmmm...
I don't trade in or on conspiracy theories. I am long some silver just like a modest amount of gold in my stock portfolio, mostly to buy ammo with after the revolution. Silver is arguably a precious metal, and often trades in sympathy with gold, but is also a commodity with commercial uses.
Or the government and central bankers that have pumped so much excess liquidity into the economy. This is indeed causing all kinds of economic distortions as I have been saying right here for years.I agree about caution with margin. But again the real problem is the institutions which are overleveraged, doing all kinds of mischievous things creating systemic risk to the entire system. But of course the retail investor will get blamed if things go too far south.
===
The swamp dwellers have noticed the game stop trading activity... something like 51 million shares changing hands daily. Rep Ilhan Omar has proposed a 0.1% stock transaction tax to raise $1T and use that to retire college debt.
This is not a new idea, in fact I have even discussed a tiny transaction tax to discourage high speed trading, just like charging postage on spam would quickly make it uneconomic. So stop presses we almost agree... but in classic political (faulty) math, if they charged 0.1% per trade they wouldn't get so many trades any more and won't raise a fraction of the money needed to buy votes with free college. But it sounds good to equally math (economics) challenged listeners.
JR