seva
Well-known member
I can´t find IC4A supply rail in the soundcraft manualI- forget the 100r- have tried 10R and 100R- I am still over 16Vcc+-, but I don´t think that could makes the dc on the outputs.
It looks like there's some current drawn or injected in the rectifier by the circuitry that follows - I guess it's the comparators, although TLO's should have negligible input bias current. Do these voltages exist when disconnected from the LED drivers?seva said:I have only a small problem with the rectifier stage for the comparators.
If no signal is present I measure on the output peak: DC30mV, output RMS has DC70mV.
You need to measure the current there; it looks like the comparators eat significant input current. One thing is that it should be preceded by a buffer (or the detector followed by a buffer).seva said:Thank you for your time Abbey!
If the comparator stage is not connected, all leds light up and I measure 0.6v at the input of this stage.
That is utterly normal; that's what it takes to compensate the voltage drop across the diode (it is commonly accepted that this voltage drop is 0.6V, but at extremely low currents, the voltage is lower).The rectifier level then shows -0.001mV at the output of the stage, but -220mv at the OP output.
Yes.seva said:Do you mean a voltage follower as I have drawn attached?
You need two resistors, both to the common and one to the NO, teh other to the NC.seva said:that is a good tip with the resistance at the switch. I've updated the circuit attached.
No, that would just inform how much current the inputs draw, which is an imortant info if you intend to drive them from a resistive source.You said something about current measurements at the input of the comparator stage ... that I will do next. This will give me information about the total consumption of the LEDs, right? Depending on the LED's and their consumption at current?
No, because all these signals are correctly referenced to zero Volt.seva said:updated
should I do the same at the switch of the new input stage for +6dB and 0dB boost?
Yes. The 1.414 factor is long-proven.seva said:I have another question about calibrating the detector stage.
Is it enough to measure a sine wave to get from the RMS value on the exact peak value?
Not better IMO, since you're adding calculation/measurement steps that are sources of errors (mistakes, actually).Or, better to create DIRAC's in the DAW, then normalize them to -3dB at the output of the DAC at + 1dBu. On the analog domain, I can boost this signal in half dB steps to + 7.5dBU to calibrate detector stage accordingly.
you need to relax...seva said:need nuggets - real nuggets!
Enter your email address to join: